Visit the CMA Website Canadian Marketing Blog

Welcome to the CMA - Canadian Marketing Association - Blog. This Blog is an initiative of the CMA Digital Marketing Council. All marketing-related topics are fair game: branding, strategy, online, offline, marketing trends, technology, direct marketing, market research...and more.


Branding

More than a logo – it’s what a company and its products and services stand for. Insights into brand building, brand essence, internal branding and brand valuation are just some of the brand matters on marketers’ minds.

Navigating Your Brand

CMA's Branding Conference is just around the corner (mark the date - June 19th)....and who better to talk it up than the Conference Chair! The organizing committee (CMA's Branding and Strategic Planning Council) has naturally been strategic in developing the conference program ...putting together a great line-up of topics and speakers, with a real focus on thought-leadership.

Tony Chapman, CEO of Capital C, kicks it off with a keynote message, equating today's marketplace as 'the perfect storm'; sharing a proven process to navigate through it. One of the themes he'll address is how to reach consumers as they run from 'mass' media to 'my' media.

Chris Staples, Partner and Co-Creative Director of the ad agency Rethink, shares his experiences and insights on how to break through the clutter of the marketplace.

The luncheon keynote is Matthew Teitelbaum, Director & CEO of the Art Gallery of Ontario (AGO), who will talk about the AGO Brand of the future. It will be fascinating to learn about the evolution of the AGO brand and the thinking behind it, knowing that the doors will open soon and we will all have the chance to see & experience yet another first-class cultural transformation in Toronto.

Throughout the day, there are a series of concurrent sessions on a variety of high interest topics that you won’t want to miss. A highlight of this year’s event is a series of 10 lunchtime roundtable discussions for you to choose from and get involved in, to name a few; Brand Innovation, Retail Branding, Mobile Marketing, Youth Branding, Organizational Alignment to Enable Brand - the full listing is on the CMA web site. Each roundtable is led by a subject matter expert.

All-in-all, a great event that you and your marketing associates are sure to enjoy and value. You will find yourself thinking about Branding a little differently after this conference!

Hope to see you there.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Navigating Your Brand' to a Friend
  • Permalink
May. 15 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by John Torella | Comments 0 posted
 

The House that Toronto FC Fans Built

If you live in the Toronto area you may have heard the roar coming from BMO field. That would be the roar from 15,000+ brand advocates and influencers. Recently I attended the ‘Live Case Study: How Marketing Made the Toronto Football Club the Talk of the Town’ hosted by the CMA’s Integrated Marketing & Customer Experience Council. Full disclosure-- I am the vice-chair of the council and I was NOT a big soccer fan, sorry I mean football… until now!! The event was held at BMO field (hence the concept of a ‘Live Case Study’) and the presenter was Paul Beirne, Director of Business Operations for the Toronto FC. His presentation focused on how the club engages their fans to sell out season tickets. After this event, I am looking for seasons tickets … anyone have a pair?

Paul, in his relaxed ‘story telling’ approach, outlined their brand attributes, positioning, strategy, objectives, communication planning and yes … their marketing tactics. This was very informative. However, one of the most interesting points Paul made during his presentation was around the importance of timing and the role it played in their success so far. Paul even stated that he does not think they would have had the same level of success 10 or 15 years ago. Why? Paul touched briefly on the research they conducted before the launch and pointed out that market demand was high. People yearned for a professional soccer team in Toronto and Canada. Toss in Toronto’s cultural diversity, an increase in youth participating in local soccer programs and finally my personal favourite, online and digital communications coming of age. From my perspective it was like the perfect storm for any marketer.

Paul pointed out in his presentation that aside from timing, there were a number of other ‘keys to successes’ at work here:
- Transparency (our club and our fans are one and the same)
- Happy mistakes (things you could not plan for)
- Connect with die-hard fans (grassroots tactics like pub crawls)
- Listen (engage the fans in the process)

Mixed into these ‘keys to successes’ was a growing movement of fans online. Even before BMO field was finished construction fans were becoming self organized via online communities like Flickr, Facebook and personal blogs. Meeting with each other online and spreading the brand long before the team ever hit the field. The club embraced and supported these brand advocates by making them part of the process and by linking to their community sites. Which by doing this, connected these communities together. Paul said the club also made a strategic decision early on to only communicate to ticket holders via electronic communications (e.g.: email, website, etc…). Not just for the cost savings … but, for the speed in which the club could ask for feedback and quickly adapt or turn around changes to their program.

And the results from the 2007 season? 15 sold out games, 95% season seat renewal, 16,000 season seat holders, and a waiting list of 7,000+. Not to mention other Major League Soccer clubs are meeting with the Toronto FC to possibly adapt some of their strategies. Also, 2008 appears to be off to a great start. Their season opening game in Columbus saw 2,400+ Toronto FC fans make their way to Columbus via bus. And most recently they defeated the Los Angeles Galaxy 3-2 and Real Salt Lake 1-0.

Although Toronto FC had timing and market demand on their side, the club is a shining example of embracing their customers (fans) from day one in a dialogue. They followed up by building brand loyalty through listening, quickly reacting and supporting them. Yankee stadium’s nick name is ‘The House that Ruth Built’ … would argue that BMO field is ‘The House that FC Fans Built’.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'The House that Toronto FC Fans Built' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Apr. 21 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by Steve Mast | Comments 0 posted
 

Comparing Apples to Apples.

Recently, I have had the same conversation with two separate people. We were talking about the Dove Revolution campaign. The people with whom I was speaking both said they couldn't believe how well that spot had done at Cannes. It did well in the interactive category. They were aghast that what was basically a television spot would do so well in an integrated category of an award show. After all, there was no real interactive component. How dare they. There was no "online experience" to be had. Nothing to do but watch the spot. I've heard this lament time and again about various campaigns. In fact, the same argument has been waged in the pages of Marketing Magazine recently where, in the letters to the editor section, one Creative Director took another Creative Director to task for arguing that a television spot or outdoor billboard posted on YouTube does not make it "online creative". Perhaps not. But here's where I have to play devils advocate.

To my mind, the internet is obviously a place where you can interact with creative. But it's also much more than that. It's also, like television, a place where you can build a brand and create awareness. Like a direct marketing campaign, it can generate a lead, collect customer information, be extremely personalized, and provide an offer. Like a retail promotion, it can get you to enter a contest and win something spectacular.

Of course, the online space is a discipline. There's a way to produce online creative that is obviously different from how you develop other creative, and you have people who specialize in the space. But it's also a channel with the power to build awareness, generate a response, and engage a consumer.

And that brings me back to the campaign that started the conversation in the first place, the Dove Revolution spot, and the reason I'm writing this post. This was my role as the devil's advocate in my conversation with my friends.

The Dove campaign won at Cannes because it was brilliant creative. Plain and simple. It didn't matter where it appeared. It ran online, but why can't the online space be used to build a brand and generate PR? People who work in the online space know its potential. But do they harbour, dare I say it, some bias that online advertising can only be immersive and clickable? Only "interactive"?

Then, after having had both conversations, I had a revelation. Perhaps the award shows themselves (like Cannes) are creating this controversy and encouraging this argument. Perhaps the problem isn't the creative. Perhaps it's the way the work is submitted and judged. Maybe it's the categories in which the creative must be entered. Was the Dove campaign competing with work that was more experiential? Were apples being compared to apples? And if not, why not? Why don't interactive award shows create categories that break the work down into the objectives of the campaign. Mass/Awareness online ads should compete with online ads that were created to do the same job. Promotional campaigns should compete with campaigns against those objectives. And so on. Perhaps they'd have to rethink how the whole award show is built. Perish the thought!

In the mean time, don't blame the Dove campaign for being beautiful. Just let it compete with its own kind.


  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Comparing Apples to Apples.' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Apr. 04 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by Bryan Tenenhouse | Comments 1 posted
 

Name that Spot!

I just saw a car commercial while watching one of my guilty pleasure shows (don't ask) and paused it before any branding revealed itself. I turned to my wife, who had seen the spot several times, and asked her who the commercial was for. She couldn't remember and neither could I. We both took a guess and we were both wrong. The logo isn't actually revealed until the end of the spot. Go figure. Here are descriptions of 5 current spots running on Canadian television (including the spot in question). See if you can name the products they're for.

1. A team of contortionists form the shape of a car.
2. A woman puts her baby to bed. An alarm goes off and the baby is now a teenager getting out of bed. In the next shot, we see him kissing his mom goodbye and leaving the house as the mother looks on lovingly.
3. A computer is pulled out of an inter-office envelope while a cool song is playing in the background. (Come on, that one’s easy.)
4. A woman is climbing on a rock wall as a grandmother repels down beside her. A microwave then drops down on a rope. The grandmother opens it, takes out the product (still hanging from the rope) and feeds the younger woman this product.
5. Two identical fish float unto a white background to a cool song.

Clearly some of the above spots are more effective and memorable than others. Some are easy to connect to their product because the product is central to the concept of the commercial. The creative doesn’t overpower the message or the product. Or the brand is so consistent across all media that the spot could only be for that product.

The key benchmark for evaluating whether a TV commercial works or not is, can you remember what the commercial was for after being entertained by it. Do you remember it the next day or a week later. If the answer is no, the spot in question wasn’t worth the money it took to produce it, or the cost of the media. It wasn’t worth a dollar. It’s that simple.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Name that Spot!' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Mar. 31 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by Bryan Tenenhouse | Comments 4 posted
 

Brand Championship

The art of being a Brand Champion is being lost in Canada as more and more Global brands are being repatriated to the head offices in the United States. This is particularly true of packaged goods marketers who 20 years ago trained most of Canada's brand champions. This repatriation combined with the acceleration to on-line and social marketing calls for two things. A dedication amongst Canadian clients and agencies to embrace the power of brands and to do so in a way that engages consumers in a digital world.

Brands are promises. Brands are trust marks not trade marks. These are not my words they are Larry Light's and while I first heard them 15 years ago they continue to resonate today. If a brand makes a promise it must keep it. It must deliver on the promise. If I promise hot food in a clean restaurant I better deliver. If I serve cold food in a dirty restaurant I have broken the promise. I have lost your trust. My brand is no longer a trust mark.

The concept of trust is even more important today than ever. Consumers must continue to trust brands but more today than ever brand marketers must build trust with customers. With trust comes loyalty. Social marketing is no more than word of mouth on steroids. If a brand breaks a promise today it can be dead or at least severely injured in a matter of hours. Brands are still trust marks, perhaps more today than ever and the brands that will flourish in the new digital world are the ones that build these trust marks collaboratively and in partnership with their customers.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Brand Championship' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Mar. 26 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by CMA
on behalf of
Tony Altilia
| Comments 0 posted
 

What Diamond Shreddies says about us.

Every so often a campaign comes along that is truly smart, fun and memorable. The new Diamond Shreddies campaign is all three.

You've probably seen the billboards. Of course there are commercials too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZeAwpPqnJU

So, what's so great about this campaign? Basically, it deconstructs everything we do as marketers, advertising professionals, clients, and customers. For example, I use a certain brand of razor. It has a blue strip across the top. Apparently, when the blue stripe turns white, it's time to start a new blade. If you've ever seen a picture of me, or met me, you know I go through a lot of blades. The marketers of those razors are brilliant. I know it's smart marketing. And I know why they added the blue stripe. I’m onto them. But I admit that before they added that little blue stripe, I used those blades at least a week or two longer than I do now and amazingly they worked just fine. Go figure.

So when the truly brilliant makers of Shreddies came out with new and improved Diamond Shreddies (urban legend has it that an intern at their agency actually came up with the idea) they not only turned the fractured mirror back on us as marketers, they also stuck a finger in the ribs of today's gullible consumer. Take a look a this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOuC5jjTZOI&feature=related

Having sat in countless focus groups, I can’t believe how spot on this little viral video is. Poor consumer. They didn't stand a chance.

I’ve never been much of a breakfast cereal eater. But now that Shreddies come in diamond shapes, I’m seriously considering them as a snack.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'What Diamond Shreddies says about us.' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Mar. 03 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by Bryan Tenenhouse | Comments 9 posted
 

The Decline (and Rise) of the Creative Brief

Now that I've started my own company, I'm reminded of how critically important the Brief Document is to developing creative. And not just good creative, but insightful, smart, relevant and strategically sound creative.

If I had to assign a grade to the average Brief I've seen over the years, I'm afraid I'd be pulling the parents into the classroom to discuss my concern for the child's future. In fact, the future of the Brief, I believe, is in serious jeopardy unless changes are made.

When I first started in this business, Briefs were treated with the respect they deserved -- both by the account people developing them and by the creative people inspired by them. I use the word "developing" up there in the previous sentence because that's really what should be happening -- and back in the old days, that is what happened. Briefs were developed by account people who understood that Briefing Documents were their opportunity to inspire brilliant creative. They weren't just filling out a form or transcribing the Client Brief from one template to another template. (Or worse, doing nothing at all.) They were developing a Creative Brief that added value, a unique perspective, clarity, and most importantly, inspiration.

Client Briefs and Creative Briefs are not the same thing.

Client Briefs contain marketing data, extensive background, customer data, research, the demands of several constituents (product managers, their bosses, marketing managers, their bosses, etc.).

Creative Briefs should be an important distillation of Client Briefs -- not just a cut and paste of the Client Brief into the Agency Creative Brief template. The Agency Creative Brief is an opportunity for the agency to gain consensus. It should be used to ensure that there is a common understanding of what is being asked by the client. The focus should be crisp. Once developed, it should be discussed, face to face with the client to ensure that what they're asking for is being understood and communicated.

When I became an Associate Creative Director, one of the Account Directors with whom I worked suggested that I review the Briefs his account team wrote before they went back to the client or were briefed into a creative team. At the time I thought that was an unusual request. But then I realized that the Creative perspective on a Brief is different than the Account Team's or Client's perspective.

I've reviewed Briefs ever since. Upon review, I would have a discussion with the Account Person and if I had any questions or if I needed clarification, they could be addressed either by said Account Person or by the client before using up valuable Creative Team time. (Too often, the strategy gets figured out during the Creative Development process instead of during the Briefing process.)

By the time the Creative Team was briefed, the Brief would be strategically sound, clear and creatively inspiring. And that means, the creative product would be right the first time. (Right the first time from the client's perspective -- because the work would fit the brief like a glove.)

So how do you know if your Brief deserves a passing or failing grade?

1. There can only be ONE Key Communication Objective. It should be one sentence. No longer. And it should be directly linked to the Customer Net Takeaway section of the brief.

2. Think about the Consumer Problem. The Brief should clearly and simply communicate what the consumer problem is. Your product or service is the Solution to that problem. And the features and benefits are the Proof that your product or service delivers. (I've just told you the secret structure to any campaign in any channel. I guarantee it works.)

3. The Features and Benefits. They are not the same thing! Knowing the difference and communicating them clearly make all the difference.

4. The Product is not the Offer. Make sure the offer is clear and it'll be clearly communicated in the Creative.

5. There is such a thing as too much information. Say everything as economically as you can and everything will be that much clearer.

6. Target Audience. If there's only one target, great. If there's more than one target, then you probably need a matrix breaking down how the Key Communication Objective changes against each target.

7. What does the Target Audience currently think? And what do we want them to think once they've been exposed to our campaign? This is important because it gives the Creative Team inspiration for how to overcome customer objections to your offering.

There is so much more that could be written about the Brief. And you're probably reading this and thinking how basic it all seems. But if you can answer YES to any of the following questions, then it might be time to think about briefing differently.

1. Does it ever seem like the Agency/Creative Team isn't "getting it"?
2. Do you ever sit in creative presentations and think "this isn't what I asked for"?
3. Do your Creative Teams ask too many questions after they've already been briefed?
4. Does it ever take more than one round of Creative to get what you thought you were going to get?
5. Do you feel like your Agency isn't adding any value?

I guarantee that if you challenge your Agency to write a Creative Brief, (or as an Agency, if you take the time to develop a Creative Brief for your teams and your Client) you will get better Creative, faster. You will cut down on the rounds of changes/new concepts. And that means you will be paying for fewer hours.

People think "process" takes up too much time -- then end up paying for the extra hours when the work needs to be done the second time.

Stop the insanity. Fix the Brief.


  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'The Decline (and Rise) of the Creative Brief' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Feb. 27 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by Bryan Tenenhouse | Comments 3 posted
 

When's the last time you enjoyed staring at the floor?

If you were at an XBOX retail store in California over Christmas, you may have seen a digital display of a soccer field beamed onto the store floor as you walked in. Through the magic of technology, the display 'reacts' to your movements, letting you 'kick' around a soccer ball on the grassy, computer generated pitch.

A Redwood, CA based firm Reactrix Systems has developed an interactive advertising platform using infrared cameras, a projector and computer to project video images onto a flat surface. THQ, Inc., a leading developer and publisher of interactive entertainment software, partnered with Reactrix this past holiday season to drive consumers to retailers and add a powerful branding element to their newest gaming releases. Reactrix created unique, interactive game-play campaigns for releases like “Spongebob’s Atlantis Squarepants,” “Ratatouille Food Frenzy,” “Avatar: The Burning Earth,” and “Cars Maternational” to help differentiate these titles from their home video and DVD campaign counterparts.

Like Nintendo Wii for retailers.
According to Bob Aniello, SVP at THQ, "Reactrix is a perfect fit in our marketing mix, especially powerful in helping create strong brand identities for gaming titles typically associated with movies and television. Reactrix provides a branding platform where we are not just delivering a message to consumers and hoping it soaks in - we are allowing them to engage and have fun with our titles, while also driving them to locations within the mall where they can purchase the game to play with at home.”

The system costs about $5,000 to install and about $4,000 per month per advertiser to get involved. Developing the interactivity is a separate cost. Reactrix is using technology to create a compelling instore experience, driving brand awareness, consumer interest and store traffic. Worth evaluating as a long term installation for major product lines or seasonal launches.

Who knew getting people`s attention was as easy as making them look at the floor?

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'When's the last time you enjoyed staring at the floor?' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Feb. 25 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by Robert McIntosh | Comments 1 posted
 

Refresh, Revitalize, Reinvent

The need to keep your Brand fresh and relevant is a crucial part of maintaining your Brand’s long-term profitable growth.

Your needs may be relatively simple:
– To refresh your Brand’s packaging
– To revitalize your store’s look and feel.

Or more complex:
– To completely reinvent and reposition you Brand to reflect a new customer focus or a global competitor.

The past decade has produced many examples of companies such as Burberry, Club Med, Kinko’s, Levi’s, Adidas, Sobeys, Abercrombie & Fitch, and Honda that have gone through a refresh, revitalize, or reinvent phase and emerged as more powerful and relevant Brands of the future.

The process and methodology is well established. To check it out reference "re/Think Retail Branding", a workbook available on the CMA or J.C. Williams Group Website.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Refresh, Revitalize, Reinvent' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Feb. 13 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by John Torella | Comments 1 posted
 

Google my brand

How important is Google to brand building?

If one were to type ‘brand’ into the Google search engine; it brings over 40 pages with 792,000,000 matches. The matches are ranked, so that the most relevant ones come first. But what influences these rankings? Every major company along with non-profit groups are now concerned about their Web reputation and ranking and pay very close attention to that first page of search results. The reputation of a company can be affected by their position on Google and this online presence can in effect, determine the strength of their brand. Google now ranks among the top 10 brands globally and is growing strong. More and more companies are competing for that top rank which in turn will facilitate their on-line brand awareness. So what in reality benefits the company – is it their own online brand experience or is it their presence on Google and hence Google’s method of branding?

The truth is, with the highest market share, the most visitors and the most powerful brand 2007, Google’s brand plays a major role in brand building. Presence on Google more than any other search engine has become a priority for companies, helping justify the strong effect of Google’s brand on individual brands. Investing in Google ad words and selecting your brand name keywords can lead to a boost in awareness and eventual revenue.

In my own business experience, we tested on-line brand building six years ago with Google Ad words, to see if it would increase lead generation for our marketing consulting practice. After twelve-months of paying for on-line advertising, we ceased as not a single new lead was generated through Google. Four years later, we tried again and this time, new business interest multiplied. Our brand awareness increased, new leads multiplied and our marketing investment paid off. This also goes on to show that now consumers/customers have become more trusting of online information which in effect has made superior online presence more valuable.

2008 will bring new dimensions of this shift to online brand awareness building and of course Google will play a key role in it. Although Google will of course be faced with greater online competition itself...not just other search engines but all methods of online brand building.


  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Google my brand' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Jan. 31 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by Patricia McQuillan | Comments 3 posted
 

Marketing Campaigns Integrate:How to Make them Great!

I really get a charge out of attending marketing industry events. It’s a great opportunity to meet up with friends, colleagues and clients. At a recent outing, there was one topic that everyone was talking about – in the formal presentations and during informal discussions. The buzz was ‘marketing integration’.

Now, if you’ve been in this industry as long as I have, you too would find this curious; it’s extremely rare that the digital marketing industry achieves complete consensus on any topic. So, I took the time to discuss some specifics on how to successfully integrate marketing campaigns.

Here’s what I concluded after hearing what other industry leaders had to say: there is indeed consensus that the growing complexity in planning, implementing and measuring online/offline marketing campaigns has caused agencies and in-house marketers alike to seek ways to work together ‘smarter’. Specifically, marketers in all industries are looking for ways to:

• Simplify campaign/program administration and coordination;
• Ensure consistency of messages and brand throughout campaigns; and
• Ensure compatibility of evolving online and offline technologies.

All of these goals are laudable (and worth striving for) because they help businesses control their marketing costs and achieve/improve measurable results.

But, integration – i.e. trying to bring all campaign-related suppliers ‘under one roof’ – isn’t required to achieve all of these goals, nor is it a panacea. At ThinData, we have successfully achieved these same goals by taking an approach that can be best described as establishing respected-partnerships. Some of the critical elements of this approach include:

Strong Project Management. This is one of the cornerstones to success. Clear, concise, and updated instructions that are regularly communicated between suppliers help to prevent confusion and conflict.

Focus on the Client. Keeping clients actively involved and at the centre of the campaign helps to ensure that their goals – which naturally evolve – remain relevant throughout short- and long-term projects.

Creating a Safe Learning Environment. Marketers in different agencies have different biases and skill levels. Bringing out the best performance in everyone requires jointly establishing practical ground rules for meetings, communications, acceptable standards and dealing with unexpected contingencies.

Here are some metrics that you can use to determine if integration is working for you and your clients:

Project Metrics – Projects are on time, on budget and run smoothly.

Business Metrics – Reduction in costs and risks regularly associated with project disruptions.

Interpersonal Metrics – Shared enjoyment working with respected partners and jointly discovering opportunities to innovate.

Client Metrics – Clients express their appreciation for working in collaboration throughout projects and regularly contract with you and your respected partners.

By adopting this disciplined approach to integration – as opposed to applying a more traditional method to integrating suppliers – you, along with your clients and respected partners will successfully address campaign complexities and truly thrive.

If, as a member of the interactive and digital marketing community, you have struggled with or overcome the challenges associated with marketing integration, I would be interested in your insights. Send an email to ceo@thindata.com or share with us here on the CMA Blog.


  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Marketing Campaigns Integrate:How to Make them Great!' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Jan. 30 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by Chris Carder | Comments 0 posted
 

2008 - "The Return of the Brand as King"

Yes I know, it’s a poor word play on the final installment of Tolkien’s famous trilogy, but I couldn’t help myself...

Every New Year brings with it lists of glorious predictions for the upcoming 12 months and an equally glorious set of lists recapping the trends that defined the outgoing year. The pundits are abounding with opinion; there is some interesting stuff out there. I’ve posted a few good links at the end of this entry, enjoy at your leisure.

Some common themes for 2008 cited by the experts are social media, all things digital and the morphing of various disciplines (media and creative, advertising and marketing etc.)

It is now accepted as a universal truth that advertising/marketing is a permanently dynamic practice. There is no single best practices hand book to help us navigate this progressive new world, just the one that is being rewritten in real time, as we all learn from experience.

But you already knew this. Unless you have been living under a rock for the past 3 or so years, none of this is new anymore. It is all that we have been hearing about, and consequently agencies and clients alike are responding, slowly but surely.

But how much during the past 3 years have you heard about branding?* Especially branding as it relates to today’s environment where consumers are exposed to thousands of messages a day and a new media outlet is created roughly every 7 seconds?

Well no matter how much you have already heard, I don’t think it is enough. 2008 should be the year where all we hear about and discuss is the brand. It is no longer about media (gasp, I can’t believe I just wrote that), technology or even the consumer for that matter. It is about the brand and media, the brand and technology, the brand and the consumer and most importantly the brand and long term strategy.**

The landscape has shifted so radically, most of us are so busy trying to keep up with the changes and the impact of these changes on our businesses that we are failing to see the forest from the trees. Former Adage Publisher Scott Donaton coined a great term, which epitomizes the situation, GMOOT- short for Get Me One of Those. It refers to a “…phenomenon that helps explain why there are so many lousy viral videos and half assed new media initiatives out there. They’re not the result of a real end strategy, but are done for the sake of doing something…”

It is time to step back and take a holistic view of our business – a 50,000 foot view if you will.

I think what we will find is that many of the fundamentals of branding still apply. Brand strategy is still the key to success, and your brand’s core values, the essence, the DNA, must remain static. We as marketers have never been in charge of our brands, this notion of consumer control is nothing new – a brand has always resided with the individual because a brand is a gut feeling*** of how a person feels about a product, service or organization. We as Marketer’s have always provided a framework for how we wish our brand to be perceived but we have never been able to control the end result of how it is finally internalized by the individual. The difference is that in today's WEB 2.0 era, we are now forced to hear what individuals really think and feel about our brands – and I say forced because this happens, whether you like it or not. Embrace it, factor it into your brand strategy. Now more than ever we must do as we say.

In 2008 watch for “The Return of the Brand as King.” Interestingly enough a sequel is already rumored to be in the works, the working title is “Brand Strategy leading Business Strategy…”

Some notes:

* The CMA put on a great conference 2007 entitled “Branding in a Sea of Change.” The follow up conference in June 2008 is one to mark on your calendar from now

**A great article in the July/August issue of Harvard Business Review, titled, If Brands Are Built over Years, Why Are They Managed over Quarters?, provides great support to the seemingly forgotten notion of long term brand planning.

***Marty Neumeier thoughts, a good read.

Links:

The Pundits - Media In Canada

Marian Salzman - EVP/CMO JWT Worldwide – especially insightful, the mention of radical transparency and cooperative consumption.

Sunni Boot – President/CEO Zenith Optimedia

Scott Goodson – CEO StrawberryFrog - mentions QR codes, a few campaigns have been executed in Canada using this technology but it is still far from mainstream. Semacode is a great Canadian company that has been involved with using the technology since 2003.

Maggie Fox – Founding Partner Social Media Group. Kudos to Maggie about being more optimistic than I am on the state of the nation. See “What surprised you this year.”

Bruce Claassen – CEO Genesis Vizeum

Tony Chapman – CEO Capital C

An Aggregation of great digital and internet prediction lists, a must view!


  • Comment on this post
  • Send '2008 - "The Return of the Brand as King"' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Jan. 08 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by Azim Alibhai | Comments 3 posted
 

So long Speedy

So long Speedy.

Last week, I felt this strange sensation. For the first time in many years, I felt like I was nothing. I spent copious hours online trying to research the reasons for my despair. It suddenly dawned on me. Speedy the Muffler King was closing down.
The company was the country's second-biggest auto-repair chain and used the slogan, "at Speedy, you're a somebody." Without having Speedy around to validate my self worth, I felt hopeless.

Seriously though, I would like to bid farewell to a well-known and loved brand. We should all take a moment to recognize Speedy’s successful marketing efforts. I don’t own and car and have never used Speedy’s services however I know who they are (were), what they stand for and what they offer. Well done. Speedy. RIP

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'So long Speedy' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Dec. 14 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Jennifer Morozowich | Comments 0 posted
 

Employment Branding: What’s Your Proposition?

In order to attract and retain top talent, a lot of companies often lose sight of the fact that they need to give their company (not just the products & services that they offer) a brand identity. Many fortune companies do a great job at this and have comprehensive marketing strategies in place specifically for recruitment and brand awareness. They spend millions ensuring that the integrity of their organization is communicated through various marketing vehicles specifically designed to attract potential employees and broadcast positive organizational messages.

You don’t have to be a multi-million dollar organization to do an exceptional job at communicating your employment proposition. By considering a few key tactics, you can be well on your way to appearing on one of those “best companies to work for” lists.

Culture.
Prospective employees are interested in more than just a pay cheque these days. They want to know what the corporate culture is like. Is there flexibility, opportunity to grow, career development, employee perks…? Is there an employee lounge with a TV and a Playstation…? Is employee teambuilding big at your organization?

Cultural fit is extremely important to employees, especially well educated ones… They’re not looking for a sweat shop, especially when there are plenty of companies around who believe strongly in work/life balance.

Awareness.
It’s one thing to have a well-kept secret; it’s another to try to get the right people to discover your secret. Brand awareness is absolutely imperative to maintaining an attractive employment proposition in the marketplace.

Engage in marketing, advertising and public relations ventures to increase the perceived value of working for your organization. Advertising your company as a great place to work will ensure that those resumes keep flowing.

Knowledge.
Arm prospective employees with as much knowledge as possible for them to make an enlightened decision about whether your company is right for them. It’s not just about finding the right candidates; it’s about ensuring that the candidates feel mutual about the relationship. People don’t like changing jobs often, and are quite happy to stick around if you make it worth their while.


Simply posting job openings on your website (especially when they are severely outdated) isn’t enough. Why not set up a separate recruiting site? Allow employees to upload their resumes directly to your site. Let them create alerts, letting them know when new positions become available. Set up social networking sites to foster dialogue and create conversations about what it’s like to work for the company. Take out ads, participate in career fairs, partner with recruiting sites. It is things like these that create positive perceptions and valuable word of mouth ambassadors.

Keeping employees happy and inspiring them to do their best, can not only lead to greater profits and increased morale, but it can push the boundaries of possibility and open many new doors.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Employment Branding: What’s Your Proposition?' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Dec. 12 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Selina Jane Eckersall | Comments 2 posted
 

Branding recreation

According to a recent Recreational Trends Study, the baby boomer generation of retirees want activities that are energetic and that don’t sound old or tired – activities like bingo, bridge, dances simply aren’t ‘hip’ or healthy enough. This Study also suggests that baby boomers want an upscale or clubby atmosphere in their recreation facilities.

What does this mean for brands in the recreation industry?

These findings suggest that baby boomers value the social aspect, relaxation benefits, and maintaining a healthy and active lifestyle in addition to the core benefit which is having 'fun'.

With so much competition it means that getting the branded market positioning right is essential to ensure that consumers, specifically baby boomers, believe they are able to fulfill these core needs.

The experience is also very important to the recreation consumer. Removing pain points and taking a service-oriented branding stance will improve the consumer interaction and help elevate the experience from ‘positive’ to ‘memorable’.

Unique to the recreation industry, is that the vast majority of consumers start their experience in a ‘pleasant’ mindset. This creates a tendency for consumer satisfaction to be skewed in the positive direction. Since there are so many recreational solutions in today’s marketplace, it is important that brands do not settle for a ‘positive’ customer experience but instead strive for a ‘memorable and positive’ customer experience.

In terms of branding a ‘memorable’ customer experience, a trustworthy, inspiring, and fun brand personality comes to mind when thinking of impactful brand characteristics targeting baby boomers with a recreation lifestyle.

What brand characteristics come to mind for you? Has anyone had a memorable brand experience with a recreation brand?

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Branding recreation' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Dec. 07 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Patricia McQuillan | Comments 2 posted
 

More Branding posts

Are you passionate about a marketing topic? Would you like to write a post about it for the Canadian Marketing Blog?
  • Submit a new post


Subscribe to our feed

May
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31




Blog Roll