Visit the CMA Website Canadian Marketing Blog

Welcome to the CMA - Canadian Marketing Association - Blog. This Blog is an initiative of the CMA Digital Marketing Council. All marketing-related topics are fair game: branding, strategy, online, offline, marketing trends, technology, direct marketing, market research...and more.


Advertising

Advertising that works (or not) in any medium. What is new, interesting or bizarre in advertising. Issues that impact advertising agencies and advertisers.

Online video isn't the future, it's the present

Google Canada hosted a showcase last week in Toronto, complete with recent case studies and numbers from YouTube.

The following stats had several jaws hitting the floor:

• 10 hours of content is uploaded to YouTube every 60 seconds
• YouTube contributors produce 3000x more output than Hollywood
• Hollywood would need to premier 57,230 feature films a week just to keep up
• YouTube currently boasts 200M+ worldwide unique visits a month
• 25% of surveyed registered YouTube viewers watch more video content online than they do on TV


YouTube Demographics
youtube_demographics.jpg

• 55% suburban, 26% urban, 19% rural
• 71% employed, 15% students
• 47% married
• 69% college educated
(source)

Several case studies were featured, including a YouTube, HP and Fox Searchlight program called “Project Direct”.

Other highlights;
Mark Nicholson from ING Direct presented the Canadian Superstar Saver Search,
Paul McGrath from CBC presented some digital strategy including “The Hour” channel on YouTube

Here’s a little Advertising on YouTube primer to get you started:

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Online video isn't the future, it's the present' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Apr. 30 2008 07:01 AM | Posted by Collin Douma | Comments 0 posted
 

Canadian Marketing Association National Convention And Trade Show Is Right Around The Corner

While the CMA - Canadian Marketing Association would never use this Canadian Marketing Blog space to promote one of their own events, I have no shame or qualms about doing it myself. Yes, in the interest of full disclosure, I am one of the Co-Chairs of the upcoming CMA National Convention and Trade Show - Next : 2008. So, I feel like it's my duty to promote it and, more importantly, encourage you (and your staff) to join me in Toronto from May 12th - 14th, 2008 (under a month to go).

Bottom line, the 2008 CMA National Convention and Trade Show is the Mother of all Marketing conferences in Canada. It is the largest gathering for those serving the Marketing, Advertising and Communications industries - both client side, agencies and suppliers. It's a whole lot of Marketing. We've also done our best to secure some of the best and brightest Marketing minds to share, and I think that the keynote line-up alone should be enough to get you there.

Some of the speakers I just can't wait to see include:

Avinash Kaushik - known by those in the Digital Marketing space as the Blogger behind Occam's Razor, Avinash's work title is Analytics Evangelist, Google (best job title ever). He's the author of Web Analytics - An Hour A Day and has quickly become one of my favourite speakers on the topic of creating and demonstrating ROI in Marketing. If you think you're going to be staring at analytics reports in this session, you have another thing coming. Do not miss Avinash. Simply put, he rocks.

Seth Godin - widely recognized as the top Marketing speaker in the world, Seth has promised that he will deliver all new content based on the concepts from his latest best-selling book, Meatball Sundae (which is a must-read). If you haven't check out his previous books, Purple Cow, Free Prize Inside, Unleashing The Ideavirus, etc... you really should. Never has anyone made Marketing so much fun, insightful and personal. Seth is an amazing Marketing mind, and if you don't subscribe to his Blog, you really should. It's right here: Seth Godin's Blog.

Dan Ariely - many moths ago, I was asked to interview Dan for my other Podcast, Foreword Thinking - The Business and Motivational Book Review Podcast. The show is sponsored by HarperCollins Canada and Dan was getting ready for the launch of his first book, Predictably Irrational. Since its recent release, the book has shot to the top of The New York Times' Best-Seller list, and is toping most best-seller lists in Canada as well. Dan is an amazingly engaging Economist and Educator who will help Marketers understand just how predictable (and/or irrational) people really are - an important concept when it comes to pricing models and Marketing.

Penelope Trunk - I met Penelope when we both gave keynote addresses at BarCamp Nashville. Penelope is a well-known Blogger, and author of the book, Brazen Careerist. Both media outlets allow Trunk to share her insights on the world of HR, and how everyone from Gen Xers and Millennials affect the workforce. As one of the biggest challenges facing the Marketing industry, HR and the future of the workforce is explained by Penelope with insights that will, without a doubt, blow your mind.

W. Mitchell - for the past few years I've had the honour of being represented by a Speaker's Bureau. I've managed to share the stage at Power Within events with the likes of Bill Clinton, Anthony Robbins, Dr. Phil, Mark Burnett and many more. In all of the conferences I have attended and all of the speakers I have seen, no speaker has touched me more than W. Mitchell. If you've ever stopped and questioned the human condition - why we're here? what are we really supposed to do with our lives? My guess is you'll ask those questions in a whole different light after seeing W. Mitchell speak. Every time I have seen him speak, I am left speechless by his power, strength, passion and compassion. You will never be the same after meeting W. Mitchell.

Also slated is Dr. Sherry Cooper (Executive Vice-President, Global Economic Strategist, BMO Financial Group, Chief Economist, BMO Capital Markets) on Global Growth -Canadian Opportunities, Sylvia Reynolds (Chief Marketing Officer, Wells Fargo & Company) on Navigating Toward Marketing Mastery - Guideposts for a New Marketing Era, and Bryan Segal (President & CEO, Rogers Publishing Limited) on Engaging Customers in a Multi-platform World... and that is just the keynote sessions.

There's also plenty going on in the concurrent sessions, on the trade show floor, in the lobby, at the hotel bar and... you get the picture.

Get psyched (as you can tell, I already am), get your tickets, and get your staff to the Marketing event of the year.

More information is available here: Canadian Marketing Association - National Convention And Trade Show - Next : 2008.

I'll see you there.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Canadian Marketing Association National Convention And Trade Show Is Right Around The Corner' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Apr. 15 2008 10:00 AM | Posted by Mitch Joel | Comments 0 posted
 

Comparing Apples to Apples.

Recently, I have had the same conversation with two separate people. We were talking about the Dove Revolution campaign. The people with whom I was speaking both said they couldn't believe how well that spot had done at Cannes. It did well in the interactive category. They were aghast that what was basically a television spot would do so well in an integrated category of an award show. After all, there was no real interactive component. How dare they. There was no "online experience" to be had. Nothing to do but watch the spot. I've heard this lament time and again about various campaigns. In fact, the same argument has been waged in the pages of Marketing Magazine recently where, in the letters to the editor section, one Creative Director took another Creative Director to task for arguing that a television spot or outdoor billboard posted on YouTube does not make it "online creative". Perhaps not. But here's where I have to play devils advocate.

To my mind, the internet is obviously a place where you can interact with creative. But it's also much more than that. It's also, like television, a place where you can build a brand and create awareness. Like a direct marketing campaign, it can generate a lead, collect customer information, be extremely personalized, and provide an offer. Like a retail promotion, it can get you to enter a contest and win something spectacular.

Of course, the online space is a discipline. There's a way to produce online creative that is obviously different from how you develop other creative, and you have people who specialize in the space. But it's also a channel with the power to build awareness, generate a response, and engage a consumer.

And that brings me back to the campaign that started the conversation in the first place, the Dove Revolution spot, and the reason I'm writing this post. This was my role as the devil's advocate in my conversation with my friends.

The Dove campaign won at Cannes because it was brilliant creative. Plain and simple. It didn't matter where it appeared. It ran online, but why can't the online space be used to build a brand and generate PR? People who work in the online space know its potential. But do they harbour, dare I say it, some bias that online advertising can only be immersive and clickable? Only "interactive"?

Then, after having had both conversations, I had a revelation. Perhaps the award shows themselves (like Cannes) are creating this controversy and encouraging this argument. Perhaps the problem isn't the creative. Perhaps it's the way the work is submitted and judged. Maybe it's the categories in which the creative must be entered. Was the Dove campaign competing with work that was more experiential? Were apples being compared to apples? And if not, why not? Why don't interactive award shows create categories that break the work down into the objectives of the campaign. Mass/Awareness online ads should compete with online ads that were created to do the same job. Promotional campaigns should compete with campaigns against those objectives. And so on. Perhaps they'd have to rethink how the whole award show is built. Perish the thought!

In the mean time, don't blame the Dove campaign for being beautiful. Just let it compete with its own kind.


  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Comparing Apples to Apples.' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Apr. 04 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by Bryan Tenenhouse | Comments 1 posted
 

Name that Spot!

I just saw a car commercial while watching one of my guilty pleasure shows (don't ask) and paused it before any branding revealed itself. I turned to my wife, who had seen the spot several times, and asked her who the commercial was for. She couldn't remember and neither could I. We both took a guess and we were both wrong. The logo isn't actually revealed until the end of the spot. Go figure. Here are descriptions of 5 current spots running on Canadian television (including the spot in question). See if you can name the products they're for.

1. A team of contortionists form the shape of a car.
2. A woman puts her baby to bed. An alarm goes off and the baby is now a teenager getting out of bed. In the next shot, we see him kissing his mom goodbye and leaving the house as the mother looks on lovingly.
3. A computer is pulled out of an inter-office envelope while a cool song is playing in the background. (Come on, that one’s easy.)
4. A woman is climbing on a rock wall as a grandmother repels down beside her. A microwave then drops down on a rope. The grandmother opens it, takes out the product (still hanging from the rope) and feeds the younger woman this product.
5. Two identical fish float unto a white background to a cool song.

Clearly some of the above spots are more effective and memorable than others. Some are easy to connect to their product because the product is central to the concept of the commercial. The creative doesn’t overpower the message or the product. Or the brand is so consistent across all media that the spot could only be for that product.

The key benchmark for evaluating whether a TV commercial works or not is, can you remember what the commercial was for after being entertained by it. Do you remember it the next day or a week later. If the answer is no, the spot in question wasn’t worth the money it took to produce it, or the cost of the media. It wasn’t worth a dollar. It’s that simple.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Name that Spot!' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Mar. 31 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by Bryan Tenenhouse | Comments 4 posted
 

Teaching Marketing Is Getting Tougher And Tougher

I'm pretty certain people like Professor Kenneth Wong will have their say, but the more time I spend with University students, the more concerned I am about the health of Marketing education.

There's no denying that young people today live in a world where wikis, YouTube, Facebook and text messaging are as prevalent in their lives as electricity was in ours. Take a look at the recent news item where a student at Ryerson University faces expulsion for using a Facebook Group to enable a virtual study group for a chemistry class (which the university saw as cheating) - Globe And Mail - Ryerson Student Cheered At Expulsion Hearing. Companies are going to be facing some serious challenges as the students become the workforce of the future.

On one side, it's challenging to have classes at the University level on topics like Social Media Marketing, Search Engine Optimization, Web Analytics, Email Marketing and Digital Media buying, because there are few teachers available with the knowledge and insight... and even fewer approved textbooks. It's an area of study that is truly organic - constantly changing and evolving. Even some of the best Marketing companies out there still struggle with these competencies as agencies scramble to build them as centres of excellence within their own organization.

Strangely enough, on the other side, most students studying Marketing and Advertising at the University level are lured to the more traditional marketing agencies (working creative for 30-second spots, etc...).

Where's the disconnect?

Is Digital Marketing still not a large enough segment of the Marketing pie to get the attention? Is it a lack of education? Or, do young people not see the opportunity going forward as more and more ad dollars shift into the Digital side?

Whatever the answer - and, my guess is it's a combination of all three, the shift is happening.

While Marketing is never recession proof (usually the exact opposite), when dollars do get pulled, it's looking like they are getting shifted to cheaper and more strategic channels (like Search Engine Marketing and Email programs) than being entirely yanked from the Marketing line of business.

Bottom line, we need more Marketers understanding the Digital side of advertising. And, if you don't believe me (after all, I'm heavily vested in this area), just take a look at the statistics.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Teaching Marketing Is Getting Tougher And Tougher' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Mar. 19 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by Mitch Joel | Comments 4 posted
 

What Diamond Shreddies says about us.

Every so often a campaign comes along that is truly smart, fun and memorable. The new Diamond Shreddies campaign is all three.

You've probably seen the billboards. Of course there are commercials too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZeAwpPqnJU

So, what's so great about this campaign? Basically, it deconstructs everything we do as marketers, advertising professionals, clients, and customers. For example, I use a certain brand of razor. It has a blue strip across the top. Apparently, when the blue stripe turns white, it's time to start a new blade. If you've ever seen a picture of me, or met me, you know I go through a lot of blades. The marketers of those razors are brilliant. I know it's smart marketing. And I know why they added the blue stripe. I’m onto them. But I admit that before they added that little blue stripe, I used those blades at least a week or two longer than I do now and amazingly they worked just fine. Go figure.

So when the truly brilliant makers of Shreddies came out with new and improved Diamond Shreddies (urban legend has it that an intern at their agency actually came up with the idea) they not only turned the fractured mirror back on us as marketers, they also stuck a finger in the ribs of today's gullible consumer. Take a look a this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOuC5jjTZOI&feature=related

Having sat in countless focus groups, I can’t believe how spot on this little viral video is. Poor consumer. They didn't stand a chance.

I’ve never been much of a breakfast cereal eater. But now that Shreddies come in diamond shapes, I’m seriously considering them as a snack.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'What Diamond Shreddies says about us.' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Mar. 03 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by Bryan Tenenhouse | Comments 9 posted
 

The Decline (and Rise) of the Creative Brief

Now that I've started my own company, I'm reminded of how critically important the Brief Document is to developing creative. And not just good creative, but insightful, smart, relevant and strategically sound creative.

If I had to assign a grade to the average Brief I've seen over the years, I'm afraid I'd be pulling the parents into the classroom to discuss my concern for the child's future. In fact, the future of the Brief, I believe, is in serious jeopardy unless changes are made.

When I first started in this business, Briefs were treated with the respect they deserved -- both by the account people developing them and by the creative people inspired by them. I use the word "developing" up there in the previous sentence because that's really what should be happening -- and back in the old days, that is what happened. Briefs were developed by account people who understood that Briefing Documents were their opportunity to inspire brilliant creative. They weren't just filling out a form or transcribing the Client Brief from one template to another template. (Or worse, doing nothing at all.) They were developing a Creative Brief that added value, a unique perspective, clarity, and most importantly, inspiration.

Client Briefs and Creative Briefs are not the same thing.

Client Briefs contain marketing data, extensive background, customer data, research, the demands of several constituents (product managers, their bosses, marketing managers, their bosses, etc.).

Creative Briefs should be an important distillation of Client Briefs -- not just a cut and paste of the Client Brief into the Agency Creative Brief template. The Agency Creative Brief is an opportunity for the agency to gain consensus. It should be used to ensure that there is a common understanding of what is being asked by the client. The focus should be crisp. Once developed, it should be discussed, face to face with the client to ensure that what they're asking for is being understood and communicated.

When I became an Associate Creative Director, one of the Account Directors with whom I worked suggested that I review the Briefs his account team wrote before they went back to the client or were briefed into a creative team. At the time I thought that was an unusual request. But then I realized that the Creative perspective on a Brief is different than the Account Team's or Client's perspective.

I've reviewed Briefs ever since. Upon review, I would have a discussion with the Account Person and if I had any questions or if I needed clarification, they could be addressed either by said Account Person or by the client before using up valuable Creative Team time. (Too often, the strategy gets figured out during the Creative Development process instead of during the Briefing process.)

By the time the Creative Team was briefed, the Brief would be strategically sound, clear and creatively inspiring. And that means, the creative product would be right the first time. (Right the first time from the client's perspective -- because the work would fit the brief like a glove.)

So how do you know if your Brief deserves a passing or failing grade?

1. There can only be ONE Key Communication Objective. It should be one sentence. No longer. And it should be directly linked to the Customer Net Takeaway section of the brief.

2. Think about the Consumer Problem. The Brief should clearly and simply communicate what the consumer problem is. Your product or service is the Solution to that problem. And the features and benefits are the Proof that your product or service delivers. (I've just told you the secret structure to any campaign in any channel. I guarantee it works.)

3. The Features and Benefits. They are not the same thing! Knowing the difference and communicating them clearly make all the difference.

4. The Product is not the Offer. Make sure the offer is clear and it'll be clearly communicated in the Creative.

5. There is such a thing as too much information. Say everything as economically as you can and everything will be that much clearer.

6. Target Audience. If there's only one target, great. If there's more than one target, then you probably need a matrix breaking down how the Key Communication Objective changes against each target.

7. What does the Target Audience currently think? And what do we want them to think once they've been exposed to our campaign? This is important because it gives the Creative Team inspiration for how to overcome customer objections to your offering.

There is so much more that could be written about the Brief. And you're probably reading this and thinking how basic it all seems. But if you can answer YES to any of the following questions, then it might be time to think about briefing differently.

1. Does it ever seem like the Agency/Creative Team isn't "getting it"?
2. Do you ever sit in creative presentations and think "this isn't what I asked for"?
3. Do your Creative Teams ask too many questions after they've already been briefed?
4. Does it ever take more than one round of Creative to get what you thought you were going to get?
5. Do you feel like your Agency isn't adding any value?

I guarantee that if you challenge your Agency to write a Creative Brief, (or as an Agency, if you take the time to develop a Creative Brief for your teams and your Client) you will get better Creative, faster. You will cut down on the rounds of changes/new concepts. And that means you will be paying for fewer hours.

People think "process" takes up too much time -- then end up paying for the extra hours when the work needs to be done the second time.

Stop the insanity. Fix the Brief.


  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'The Decline (and Rise) of the Creative Brief' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Feb. 27 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by Bryan Tenenhouse | Comments 3 posted
 

5 Ideas that Pack a Punch

I attended the 2nd Annual Business of Ideas Forum on Tuesday, February 12th. I may be biased, but I felt the day was packed with inspiration and incredible examples of successful innovation at work. Just goes to prove that you are never through with learning and accepting the status quo just isn’t acceptable.

Here are the 5 morsels of wisdom that I’ve etched in my psyche courtesy of great Canadian leaders and the brands they manage:

1) Giving back to your community not only helps others thrive and feeds your soul but can also contribute to the economic prosperity of a city. Tony Gagliano (Executive Chairman and CEO, St. Joseph Communications), shared his vision of a world-class Toronto and in the process put this great city on the global map as a leader in arts and creativity.

2) Maybe strategy isn’t king. Jim Little of RBC encouraged us to think less, do more, be brave, challenge convention and sometimes, listen to the those crazy voices that tell you something is ‘right’. His own testament to this belief is Frank and Gordon – Canada’s favourite beavers. Love ‘em or hate ‘em….they are proof that Jim is a man following his own vision.

3) Leaders create the smell of the place. Brilliant. Nothing else needs to be said. I personally thank Tim Penner, president of Procter & Gamble Inc, for encouraging a room full of senior executives to act upon what they expect of their own staff.

4) Listen to your consumers. Nothing new here except a channel that makes this an immediate reality and the technology to bring it forward. Kudos to power brands such as Home Depot and Walmart for being brave enough to do what not enough of their peers are doing. They are the evangelists for consumer generated content.

5) The time is always right for great storytelling. Proof positive: Galen G. Weston In his charming, articulate and motivating way, he shared how getting back to the roots of Loblaws by telling the stories behind the products they sell – is what will position this chain as a future leader. And I’d bet that there isn’t a Canadian among us who couldn’t recite a personal memory about the Dave Nichol’s days, introduction of Green Environmental Bags or even the Decadent Chocolate Chip Cookie.

Great day - thoughtful conversation, an opportunity to network and even some amusing banter about brands we thought we knew. I, for one, will be taking advantage of the early bird offer for the 3rd Annual Business of Ideas Forum. Where do I sign up?

  • Comment on this post
  • Send '5 Ideas that Pack a Punch' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Feb. 20 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by CMA
on behalf of
Robin Whalen
| Comments 1 posted
 

2008 Outlook During Economic Slowdown

Our CEO passed along an article from the Economist that contains some interesting points. Keep in mind that this is more from a global perspective:

-Maurice Levy (Publicis) expects ad budgets to be reduced in '09 versus '08 because of big ticket events in 2008; namely US election, Olympics in Beijing and the European football challenge.
-Martin Sorrell (WPP) expects 2008 to be a reasonale year but indicates that 2009 could be painful.
-Underlying growth in ad spending will come from mainly emerging markets and the internet.
-TV and print expenditures will likely be most impacted by any economic downturn.
-Search expenditures will likely be the safest.

It will be interesting as the gap between time spent online and online ad expenditures narrows. Obviously the economy will have a massive influence on what happens over the next 12 months. See "Hard Sell"

  • Comment on this post
  • Send '2008 Outlook During Economic Slowdown' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Feb. 06 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by CMA
on behalf of
Luke Moore
| Comments 1 posted
 

The 2008 Superbowl welcomes women

The Globe and Mail recently published an article about how women's products are going to be featured in advertisements during the superbowl this year. Companies are realizing that women watch sports too (surprise)! This is a huge opportunity for companies to promote products directed towards women, rather then the usual beer and food ads that target men. I am wondering how men are going to respond to these ads? Will it affect viewership? I am interested to see sales results for women's products advertised during the superbowl. It has been proven in past years that products advertised during the superbowl are linked to an increase in sales for that company. Will this prevail for women's products? Men, move over. Companies are making room for women at the 2008 superbowl!

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'The 2008 Superbowl welcomes women' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Jan. 29 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by CMA
on behalf of
Sarah Lloyd
| Comments 2 posted
 

The high price of mail-in rebates

If you have ever gone through the process of sending in a "mail-in rebate" form, you know what level of frustration this can cause.

There is fine print to read, and deadlines to meet. You must remember to include everything that is required, or you will not receive the money. You invest your own time and energy, not to mention the postage stamp. However when you've finally completed all the work, you mail off your forms and expect a cheque back. In most cases you wait 8 weeks at a minimum. 8 weeks in a time when anyone can order almost anything from anywhere and receive it within a week.

I went through this process with a mail-in rebate offer from a major home improvement company. I had to purchase some paint one weekend and decided to go with a particular brand because the nice lady behind the counter suggested that there was a mail-in rebate offer of $20 if I bought 2 cans. Frustrations started when I received a letter back from the mail-in rebate company suggesting I was past the due date. I sent a letter back reminding them that I had sent it in on time and that even the date of their letter was, in fact, within the rebate due date. I received another letter stating that I had not included the correct information. I sent them a letter back reminding them that they had kept my original letter with all the correct information and proof of purchases. I received nothing in response.

I know that retailers "farm out" the mail-in rebate business to third-party fulfillment companies. According to this website the agreements between the two companies have a lot to do with guaranteeing the retailer that no more than a certain percentage of rebates will be mailed in. If there are more actual Customer rebate requests than the guaranteed percentage, the third party company will absorb the refund themselves. This doesn't convince me that these mail-in rebate companies are working in the best interest of the retailer or the Customer.

Retailers rely on the fact that the majority of people do not send in the rebate offer. The retailer gets the sales because of the rebate offer incentive, but is not on the hook for the full rebate amount. We are in an age where Customers are losing their patience and are looking for a retailer that can be open, honest and provide the best experience. There are too many retailers to choose from today. Those that still offer mail-in rebates are putting themselves at risk of losing those Customers in the long run for a quick one-time sale.

Is it worth it? Best Buy has decided it is not. They announced about a year ago that they will phase out all mail-in rebates. They are one of the first major retailers to realize what the rest of us have known for a long time. Mail-in rebates are good for sales in the short term, and bad for business in the long term. The long term plan is to implement the following: when you buy something at Best Buy, the "mail-in rebate" is given to you at the check-out counter. No forms, no proof of purchase requirements, no stamp and no waiting for 3 months to see if an invisible company has deemed your submission to be valid. In the mean time they have made things easier by allowing you to submit a rebate offer online, and track the progress.

If your organization offers mail-in rebates, perhaps it's time to ask your Customers what the cost is to their loyalty?

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'The high price of mail-in rebates' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Jan. 24 2008 09:00 AM | Posted by Graham Kingma | Comments 3 posted
 

Social Networks And Ad Spend - Should We Change What We Mean By Ad Spend?

eMarketer has reported $1.2 billion in projected advertising spend within social networks this year (an amazing 70% of money being spent is between MySpace and Facebook). As 37% of the US adult population and 70% of teens are frequenting social networking sites, it is a no-brainer that marketers and advertisers are keen to tap into these entities.

As more dollars shift to digital , eMarketer pegs total ad spend of $4 billion worldwide by 2011 against online social networks alone. Those are serious numbers. Naturally, the next question is "what will result from that spending in terms of effectiveness?"

emarketerd.gif

My belief is that before we label social network marketing efforts as "ad spend", we should take a step back and see what is intended for those dollars and how they will be truly allocated. We know that Users do not want to be advertised to, so it may be misleading in terms of the investments marketers will make.

As I have previously written about over at The Client Side Blog and have recently read re:Chris Brogan's and Mack Collier's opinions, I wonder if we should begin segmenting our budgets to reflect "engagement spend" or "community spend" or "conversation spend"?

Outside of the online world we isolate budgets for sponsorship, local area marketing, community events etc.., all with unique objectives, goals and outcomes. So perhaps we should spend some time reviewing what we hope to achieve in social networks and take it from there. Lumping it all under advertising just sounds too easy.

The eMarketer study shows that brands see a huge opportunity to engage Users in social networks. My hope is that we are beginning to think beyond interruption and approach interaction as a platform. Marketers will have to challenge themselves to find the right balance of novelty, utility and relevance for todays consumers. Our best hope is that a good chunk of the "ad spend" goes to something other than ads.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Social Networks And Ad Spend - Should We Change What We Mean By Ad Spend?' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Dec. 14 2007 12:29 PM | Posted by Michael Seaton | Comments 1 posted
 

So long Speedy

So long Speedy.

Last week, I felt this strange sensation. For the first time in many years, I felt like I was nothing. I spent copious hours online trying to research the reasons for my despair. It suddenly dawned on me. Speedy the Muffler King was closing down.
The company was the country's second-biggest auto-repair chain and used the slogan, "at Speedy, you're a somebody." Without having Speedy around to validate my self worth, I felt hopeless.

Seriously though, I would like to bid farewell to a well-known and loved brand. We should all take a moment to recognize Speedy’s successful marketing efforts. I don’t own and car and have never used Speedy’s services however I know who they are (were), what they stand for and what they offer. Well done. Speedy. RIP

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'So long Speedy' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Dec. 14 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Jennifer Morozowich | Comments 0 posted
 

Canada's Next Top Ad Exec Competition

The CMA blog is the perfect place to say thanks to CMA for sponsoring “Canada’s Next Top Ad Exec” competition. It’s the second year of this national advertising and marketing competition for business students – brought to life by the DeGroote School of Business at McMaster University and Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Canada. It’s open to 160,000 undergraduate business, MBA and business minors from across the country. The challenge this year is to create an advertising solution for the Mitsubishi brand with a focus on new media.

The top winners (up to two) will literally drive away in a shiny, new Mitsubishi Lancer (this year’s competition is open to teams of two). And the runners-up have an opportunity to obtain summer internships with (so far) CMA and BBDO Toronto and win a host of other industry sponsored prizes.

Top Ad Exec was conceptualized as an experiential education program with the mandate of creating a bridge between industry and universities such that it facilitates a constant exchange of expertise, mentorship, career opportunities, and experiential learning in the areas of marketing and communication - it is hoped that this forum will invite industry influence on the expanse of university curricula and attract the brightest business minds to marketing careers.

While not the first amongst competitions for business students, Canada's Next is unique in that it has a special focus on advertising and marketing, offers the richest prizing and mimics the real world like no other. The competition gives students the opportunity to display their marketing savvy and creativity in an environment outside of the classroom - though some schools have already come forward with the plan to integrate the program into their curricula. The judging is rigorous with a panel of industry and academic leaders joining hands to deliver the verdict.

In 2006-7 the program had unexpected PR exposure of over 6.15 million impressions. Competitors came from across Canada - the top ten finalists from UBC, U Alberta, Queens, Western Ontario, McGill, Mount Allison and McMaster. Top prize ($30,000 Eclipse) went to Monica Walker from Queens. Finalist David Sherrard of McMaster nailed second spot and a career opportunity at Mitsubishi as Marketing Analyst.

So far, more than thirty business schools are signed up to participate. And we’re inviting more Canadian organizations to become program partners. Partners will be visionary organizations committed to enhancing the educational experience of university students; contributing value by rewarding, recognizing, and playing a critical role in developing the leaders of tomorrow.

If you are an organization hiring a marketing intern this summer, want to foster marketing as a career opportunity, or want to just simply get involved – Canada’s Top Ad Exec may be the perfect win-win. Contact us or get more info about sponsorship.

And students - you can’t win if you don’t play – visit nopitchdontbitch.ca for competition details. First submission deadline is January 25th, 2008.

nopitchdontbitch.ca

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Canada's Next Top Ad Exec Competition' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Dec. 11 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by CMA
on behalf of
Adam Vespi
at McMaster
| Comments 0 posted
 

Price-less Questions

I don’t have any answers, just questions…a lot of questions.
My questions are about messaging, communication, dialogue and interaction.
Definitions are in order.
Messaging: one way offer-to-purchase/act
Information: a (partial) telling of the brand story
Interaction: a consumer initiated program constrained exchange
Dialogue: two-way dynamic flow of information

Generating profitable sales is the number one goal of an enterprise. Without it the enterprise can not move forward. But in our endeavor to secure profitable sales, are we perhaps creating bigger problems for ourselves?

Despite all of the other communication options, it seems (to me) that the vast majority of our customer outreach simply promotes a price point call to action. But in our endeavor to generate the “Buy this for $2.99 now”, are we perhaps conditioning our customers to be price sensitive? I raise this now because ever since the loonie hit parity with the greenback – it seems we can’t turnaround without some sort of price comparison being featured in the mass and social media - and on the verge of the biggest purchasing season.

So how does one compete? Yes one needs to have competitive prices that reflect fair value. But in the rush to meet the quarterly targets we seem to have become overly fixated on the price and dare I say, not giving customers enough opportunity to learn more about the brand story.

What percent of your brand activity is allocated to messaging vs communication? 90/10? 60/40?
Does it have to be an either/or choice?

The good news is that we can accommodate both simultaneously by having our product as the hero/solution in the communication with price in a support role. Think back to Loblaws Insider’s Report – did anybody care about the prices (they were there) or were you captivated by learning about the new wonders they found in the far flung corners of the world? Need more convincing?
Consider this example of the messaging-communication evolution taking place at Dell.

Dell2.0%20ad%20evolution.jpg

So if we can successfully message and communicate - what about a triple play: message, communicate and interact/dialogue?

Consider inviting your customers to a higher level interaction by incorporating a hyper link to a poll regarding some feedback you ‘want’ (maybe colors for the next season) or perhaps a link to a company progress report on some social/good works initiative. The point is by layering this additional dimension you are communicating much more than just the price point – you are communicating that you are a partner looking for input and interaction regarding the future.

This will not be of interest to all consumers, but excluding those who only want a transactional relationship, the mere overture casts your brand in a different light - that of a partner.

So next time you gather round the water cooler to do the Loto 649 happy dance because your response rate broke the 20% mark (well done BTW) – think about the 80%. Think about those who found the message irrelevant for whatever reason? Did you just miss an opportunity to communicate or even dialogue with them on some higher level? I wonder what the ROI will be on that?

Like I said, lot’s of questions.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.


  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Price-less Questions' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Nov. 30 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Miro Slodki | Comments 0 posted
 

More Advertising posts

Are you passionate about a marketing topic? Would you like to write a post about it for the Canadian Marketing Blog?
  • Submit a new post


Subscribe to our feed

May
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31




Blog Roll
  • AdRants

    Marketing and Advertising News With Attitude

  • AIMS Canada

    Association of Internet Marketing & Sales

  • B2B