Peering Into the Marketing Crystal Ball - Part III
Here are the final two of four key areas that together will challenge b-to-b marketing leaders in the upcoming year.
Three: Expanding Influence
Ah, the arguments that emanate from the hallways of b-to-b organizations worldwide, as sales and marketing fight over who actually sourced the lead that blossomed into a huge revenue producer. When marketing sees its only influence on results as “sourced” pipeline, these arguments will not only continue, they will grow louder, meaning that marketing must expand how it defines its influence on the enterprise. We recommend a four-pronged strategy for the evaluation of marketing’s business influence, including sourced, recycled, touched and facilitated. “Recycled” influence evolves around the measurement of how many leads that are fed to sales and rejected for various reasons are deposited back into marketing for further nurturing, as well as how many leads are resubmitted and what opportunity these leads wind up driving. This puts particular attention – and definitive value – on a critical role of marketing that is often scarce in b-to-b organizations. “Touched” influence measures how marketers are impacting demand that they do not source, whether the demand is sourced within inside, field or channel sales. We continue to see many marketing functions that have the charter not only of filling the top of funnel, but helping to propagate demand within the funnel that they no longer own. By leveraging the materials they are using to create “original” demand into tools and mini-programs that can be administered by sales, marketers drive incremental spending leverage and impact. Finally, the notion of “facilitated” demand revolves around the reputation-focused activities discussed above. By targeting key categories of influencers – both “formal” and “informal” – spend on reputation can be demonstrated in terms of its ability to foster demand creation.
Four: A Technological Crossroads
Every day, technologists are building an increasing number of tools and services to assist the b-to-b marketing function in its quest to be more systematic and measurable. And while these tools and services are being purchased at rapid rates, the ability for many organizations to use more than their most basic levels of functionality has been challenged at best. This is due to the fact that in all cases – whether we are discussing lead scoring, automated lead routing, tool/collateral delivery, message measurement efficacy or any other marketing innovation – the technology must be backed by process, and leadership at an executive level. One of the greatest threats to these technologies is their own marketing efforts, promising the ability to be up and running quickly; what’s “up and running” generally isn’t the advanced functionality in these systems, due to the fact that they require significant planning and collaboration between marketing and sales to make it work. Without constant drive from a marketing leader to ensure that maximum advantage is being gained from these often expensive purchases, companies tend to drag their feet when it comes to this planning and collaboration. The technology is now available to tackle the tasks that only five years ago were nearly impossible at worst and highly manual at best. We believe the technology can work. But we also believe that we are quickly heading toward a watershed point with these technologies in terms of whether their promise will truly be realized, or only a portion of their promise as we have seen with CRM/SFA systems.
A common theme for all of these imperatives is strong marketing leadership, the kind of leadership that is required to change the way the function measures itself, collaborates with sales and organizes for success. Driving change doesn’t only require conviction, however; it requires focus. When 2009 comes, will you be able to say that you were wedded to the right changes?








