Visit the CMA Website

Canadian Marketing Blog

Welcome to the CMA - Canadian Marketing Association - Blog. This Blog is an initiative of the CMA Digital Marketing Council. All marketing-related topics are fair game: branding, strategy, online, offline, marketing trends, technology, direct marketing, market research...and more.


The Clipping File

If you’re visiting the CMA blog this holiday Monday, we hope you’re enjoying our last long weekend of summer. I can’t think of a better time to dive into the clipping file and catch up on reading that I've been procrastinating over. Once I got through them, I found these articles interesting and entertaining. Perhaps you will to.

1.How Ads Affect Our Memory – New Research could help advertisers make a better impression. By Andrew Schrock, Tuesday, August 21, 2007, technologyreview.com

A new study suggests that marketers shouldn't fixate on the number of people who click on ads. According to the research, just seeing an ad on a Web page can impact memory. The findings could have a significant impact on the way online advertising is made and metered.

Typically, to be considered effective, an online advertisement has to elicit a response--usually a click of the mouse--from a potential customer. But Chan Yun Yoo, an assistant professor at the University of Kentucky's School of Journalism and Telecommunications, found that when people view Web advertisements, they store information in two different types of memory: explicit and implicit.

Explicit memory involves facts learned through conscious interaction, while implicit memory involves unconscious retention. Click here for the complete article.

2. Color Branding: The Meanings Behind Colors –
Brandcurve.com delivers a daily dose of insightful and interesting reading on a range of communication topics that us marcom types like to ponder. This article was originally posted on Aug 14, 2007, by John Williams on Entrepreneur.com, who provides plausible explanations of the meaning behind colour and how our reactions can impact what we think about advertising or promotion.

Blue: Cool blue is perceived as trustworthy, dependable, fiscally responsible and secure. Strongly associated with the sky and sea, blue is serene and universally well-liked. Blue is an especially popular color with financial institutions, as its message of stability inspires trust.

Red: Generates a visceral response and makes us aggressive, energetic, provocative and attention-grabbing. Count on red to evoke a passionate response, albeit not always a favourable one.

Green: In general, green connotes health, freshness and serenity. However, green’s meaning varies with its many shades. Deeper greens are associated with wealth or prestige, while light greens are calming.

Yellow: In every society, yellow is associated with the sun. Thus, it communicates optimism, positivism, light and warmth. Certain shades seem to motivate and stimulate creative thought and energy. The eye sees bright yellows before any other color, making them great for point-of-purchase displays.

Click here for the complete article, click here

4.The New York Times online technology section: if you still have a few hours to kill before dinner, The Times' technology section is a great read. It's jam packed with interesting info on curent events, new technologies and the usual scuttlebut on the big players. Great web design too that makes navigating easy. Satisfying any day of the week.

Now that Labour Day is upon us, I look forward to longer nights, sitting through endless 2008 planning sessions and creating hundreds of 'what if' scenarios with the '08 marcom budget. And then the real work begins with the upcoming season of award shows and rounds of agency holiday parties. Another crazy busy Fall.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'The Clipping File' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 03 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Robert McIntosh | Comments 0 posted | Categories This and That -

Using Search Engine Marketing to start an Argument.


This past week I sat in on a lunch hour webinar hosted by Pragmatic Marketing. The speaker was David Merrman Scott who recently published “The New Rules of Marketing and PR.” I read his other work, “The New Rules of PR,” so I was interested in hearing his new marketing pointers.

David used the launch of his book as a case study on effective search engine marketing techniques, specifically how to reach opinion leaders. In his case, the leaders he connected with generated wide coverage for his message which led to an explosion in his site traffic, book downloads and sales.

Merrman Scott is notable because he realized what many small business owners try to do –get attention in a media fragmented world without taking a second mortgage out on the house. His practical tips are useful for the entrepreneur who needs straightforward advice on getting a message out as quickly and cheaply as possible.

No Interruption Required
The era of PR people spamming journalists with story ideas to get product coverage is OVER. In the old days, you had to have significant news before you were allowed to write a press release. It usually included quotes from 3rd parties like customers, analysts or experts. And the only way your buyer would learn about the content was if the media wrote a story about it. Plus one of the only ways to measure ROI was by counting product mentions in press clipping books.

Search Engine Marketing (SEM) is the only form of marketing that does not rely on audience interruption or cajoling an editor to get you attention. The internet has eliminated these practices, giving marketers direct access to buyers, where they scan Google and Yahoo! results pages at will, and consider a product story – in its original, unedited state.

However to appeal to your customers directly, you need to understand them intimately.

Getting to Know You.
To appeal to your buyers directly on the web, you need to understand their motivations, brand experiences and interest level in your product category. To do so, consider developing “buyer personas.” This makes writing content that appeals to a range of customer beliefs, attitudes, shopping needs and vocabulary – much easier.

For example, a big box home electronics store identified three buyer personas –Gordon the UBER GEEK, Harry the home theatre NUBIE, and Louise the “just visiting” casual shopper. In each case, distinct language, tone and content depth were incorporated onto their site to appeal to their user base and ensure product messaging was relevant and understood.

Once you understand your customer archetypes, it’s time to write press releases for them.

1. Write releases with ample keyword copy so your release can be crawled and included on search engine results pages more frequently

2. Understand the words and phrases that buyers understand

3. Create links in releases to your website that bring people to your site

4. Optimize press release delivery for searching and browsing

5. Drive people into the sales process and selling cycle with press releases

If you want your press release crawled by Google news and Yahoo news services, David suggests distributing your story using any of the following services: Businesswire, Prime newswire, or Market wire.

The cost can be as low as $80 to send a basic release. However to include anchor text links and photographs – features that let readers link back to your site, is in the $200 range.

In short order, his book release was picked up and reviewed positively by Seth Godin, an influential voice in marketing circles, and negatively by Steve Rubel, an influential PR writer.
Because these two power brokers had conflicting opinions, it fuelled more discussion and interest.

Before he knew it, David Merrman Scott was enjoying top natural search ranking results, incredible site traffic and more than 250,000 book downloads.

I wonder what would have happened if Seth and Steve had agreed on the book?

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Using Search Engine Marketing to start an Argument.' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 05 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Robert McIntosh | Comments 2 posted | Categories Strategy -

The problem with Loyalty is…Loyalty

There are 32,700,000 google links to the word loyalty. And I am almost willing to bet there are almost as many different interpretations of what loyalty means.

For some it’s a based on Share of Wallet or frequency of purchase or emotional linkages or the absolute size of one’s LTV. Others still seek to transform customers into purchasing machines - habit devoid of comparison.

Consumers on the other hand confuse the issue even more by buying on the basis of the price pattern and incentive conditioning we teach them, on the basis of convenience or indeed on the basis of some level of preference bestowed upon a competitive set of brands.

Part of the problem is that we are using the wrong word to describe what we are trying to accomplish. According to Meriam-Webster:

Loyalty
: unswerving in allegiance: as a): faithful in allegiance to one's lawful sovereign or government b): faithful to a private person to whom fidelity is due c): faithful to a cause, ideal, custom, institution, or product.

Do customers have an unswerving allegiance? Are they faithful? Does any of this remotely describe the realities of a commercial exchange? It’s no wonder that reaching a consensus definition on ‘loyalty’ isn’t forthcoming. But, consider a different term – one which captures the ebb and flow customers have with different brands at different times, places, occasions.

Perhaps we should be using:
Affinity: sympathy marked by community of interest : KINSHIP; likeness based on relationship or causal connection.

Let us then consider the use of brand affinity in place of brand loyalty. And if we can agree that a brand is defined by the promises kept, then loyalty should be defined as an affinity strengthened.

Affinities are like alliances built on interests – and to borrow a quote from Henry Kissinger, “ A brand doesn’t have friends – it has interests.”

Viewed from the standpoint of affinities – I think it becomes easier to understand the nature and strength of the relationship.

There’s my definition – so now we have 32,700,001.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'The problem with Loyalty is…Loyalty' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 06 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Miro Slodki | Comments 0 posted | Categories Branding -

Apple hits the news again

Apple has just released their new line-up of iPods. The media attention around anything Apple releases these days is incredible. Professor Yoffie at Harvard estimated that the free publicity Apple has received with the launch of the iPhone is around $400 million dollars.

How does that happen?

It helps to sell 100 million iPods before you release a cell phone. Apple knows how to make products that are user friendly. So user friendly that they have always had a genuine cult following since the first Apple Computer was released back in 1976 (my Apple Mac Plus helped me through university). The cult following exists because Apple is an expert at making revolutionary products (most personal electronics companies know how to make evolutionary products).

So the new iPods look incredible and the hype is happening again.

Over the years I have owned windows computers and (for the last 3 years) a Sony digital music player. Sony just announced that they are closing their online music download store. Sony forced Customers to convert their music to something called ATRAC (Sony's version of mp3's) and use a software package that was not easy to work with. To make matters worse their music players (up until more recently) would not play mp3's.

I've spent the last couple of days reloading my CD's onto iTunes and will soon be drinking the Apple kool-aid when I purchase one of the new iPods for sale at the end of September '07.

I would love to hear stories from others about whether they've joined the Apple craze (most have I assume) and if not, how come?

I admit that I should have been there all along. After all, that excellent Apple Mac Plus I had back in 1989 should have been enough to keep me in the cult from the beginning.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Apple hits the news again' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 07 2007 09:06 AM | Posted by Graham Kingma | Comments 0 posted | Categories Branding -

Corporate Blogs - the new breakfast meeting?

Organizations are seeing the value of creating and maintain blogs for their senior management team as an alternative to traditional PR channels. Arguably the most widely used and understood of user generated content types, blogs can be an effective way for execs to carve out a unique voice for their organization and connect with stakeholders – employees, customers and the investor community in a personal, more authentic way.

Blogs have also been used as a way for companies to locate highly engaged company evangelists and loyal product users. Once identified, it`s not uncommon to invite them into the organization for product previews, marketing program feedback and other planning initiatives. These evangelists are then more predisposed to deliver positive key messages to a wider online audience for you.

Business blogs can interact with a target market on a more personal level and build credibility that ultimately can be tied back to the corporate website. Nevertheless, they remain public relations tools that should be carefully, regularly monitored by your PR team. If you`re interested in setting up your own company blog, consider these starting points.

1. Identify important blogs in your industry including influential writers and opinion leaders.

2. Monitor target blogs regularly to understand what people are saying about your company (if anything at all), the market you sell to and leaders in your product category.

3. Ask senior executives to comment on other people's blogs, which can be an effective first step in delivering key messages, stimulate discussion, or reframe a competitive statement.

It`s estimated that 5% of Fortune 500 companies maintain external blogs and the number is growing by approximately 30% every quarter. The ones I've listed here are pretty good – they’re current, regularly updated and well written:

1. Mike Critelli, Executive Chairman, Pitney Bowes, Inc., "Open Mike"

2. Colin Byrne, CEO, Weber Shandwick UK - Byrne Baby Byrne

3. J. Willard Marriott Jr., CEO, Marriott International

4. Rudi Fischer, CEO, Telekom Austria - Rudi Fischer

5. David Armano, Creative VP, Digitas

6. Sab Kanaujia, VP, NBC Digital Media group - Sabk

Consider blogging as a fresh approach to delivering company points of view to key stakeholders with the added bonus of meeting super engaged customers. Could the days of the 7:30am corporate breakfast meeting be numbered?

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Corporate Blogs - the new breakfast meeting?' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 10 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Robert McIntosh | Comments 2 posted | Categories PR -

Why there'll never be another Johnny Carson and why that makes our job as marketers that much harder.

Just got back from vacation this week. While I was off, I had the opportunity to read a collection of essays from one of my favourite writers. His name is Chuck Klosterman and he bills himself as a Pop Culture Critic. (Perhaps you've read one of his articles in Esquire, or one of his books. I highly recommend Sex Drugs and Coco Puffs.) He writes brilliantly about everything from celebrity to music to advertising to why there'll never be another Johnny Carson....which got me thinking about what that means for our industry. Here's why...

As Klosterman tells it, after Johnny Carson died, he kept hearing media types say that there'll never be another Johnny Carson. Klosterman says there very well could be another human being who is as funny, self-deprecating, and talented as Carson. However, there will never be a centrifugal cultural force like Johnny Carson again. Ever. There will never be a (quote) Johnny Carson (unquote) or a (quote) Walter Cronkite (unquote) for that matter. And the reason?

When Johnny Carson ruled the airwaves there were only three major television networks. There was no internet. There was no cable. There was Carson. A book. Or bedtime. Ask anyone, even around the world what Heeeerrrre's Johnny refers to and everyone knows. Everyone.

To Klosterman, Carson represented the one place all of North America went before they went to bed. Every night. There was a common understanding and appreciation of his contribution. You didn't choose between Carson and...anyone else. You chose Carson. Arguably, his loss represents the loss of a singular common positive experience.

Today, Klosterman argues, we are inundated with choice. From our credit cards to our McDonalds Menu Items to the 500 channels on our PVR.

Is this a bad thing? Maybe. Maybe not. But Klosterman thinks that maybe it makes for just a bit of a lonelier existence. We determine our own Personal Rogers On-Demand TV programming. We network virtually on Facebook and through email alone from behind our personal keyboards. We can even watch television on our own tiny iPod screens while we're in transit, all alone, on our crowded street car.

And of course, because we all have so much choice when it comes to how we consume our popular culture, including our advertising messages, our job as marketers is that much more challenging. That's not news anymore. But it is inspiring.

We may have lost that singular common positive experience (which is a little sad frankly from a cultural perspective). But from a marketing perspective, it's made room for much more opportunity -- if you're willing to accept the challenge.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Why there'll never be another Johnny Carson and why that makes our job as marketers that much harder.' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 11 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Bryan Tenenhouse | Comments 0 posted | Categories Advertising - Customer Experience -

The Truth About Media

So it seems that pretty much everyone has something to say these days about the state of media and the fragmented landscape, especially consultants. The latest big name to weigh in with their findings is Deloitte, with a report titled, "State of the Media Democracy". This study follows in the footsteps of another consultant report, Big Blue’s 2006 “The End of TV as we know it” (A pretty interesting read…)

The Deloitte report provides some good US stats by category groupings based on age. I imagine the deeper insights, such as the use of the term “democracy” within the context of media, are reserved for paying clients…
That said, the question du jour is why all of the interest in media? Why now? Is it even warranted?

Truthfully speaking, all of this attention is actually rather flattering for us media folk, we are still only getting used to our “superstar” status. After years of being relegated to the last few minutes of creative presentations (I never understood how 80% of a client’s budget got such little interest) media is now at the forefront, as I would argue that it should be. But do you think it should it be?

Join the conversation.


  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'The Truth About Media' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 12 2007 03:10 PM | Posted by Azim Alibhai | Comments 0 posted | Categories Advertising -

Why All the Confusion?

Brand bylines, positioning lines, promotional themes, and symbols are often used interchangeably but in fact, they are quite different.

Brand bylines are simply a description: Maytag Appliances or Ace Hardware.
Positioning lines are much more. They are an attempt to seek out a specific customer with specific appeal: Sears “Good Life at a Great Price.”
Promotional themes are used to support a promotion or seasonal event: The Brick’s Midnight Madness Sale.
Symbols are an effective way to support your Brand: the lonesome Maytag repairman, Michelin man, Nike swoosh, Energizer bunny.

Understand these Brand tools and use them effectively to support your Brand.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Why All the Confusion?' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 13 2007 10:00 AM | Posted by John Torella | Comments 1 posted | Categories Branding -

Technology = happiness

Last week, I had a debate with a coworker regarding the internet. The discussion was on whether or not the internet makes our lives easier or if it is a time inhibitor. I think the difference is generational. For Millennials, they don't know a world without the internet and technology. Take that away from them and it would be like taking a toy away from a baby.

A recent issue of eMarketer claims that technology is a part of a balanced life for most youths and keeps them upbeat.

Young people age 13 to 24 today are generally very happy and optimistic about the future, according to an MTV-Associated Press study conducted by Knowledge Networks in April 2007.

Nearly two-thirds of respondents said they were happy with the way things were going in their lives in general, and 62% thought they would be even happier in the future. Only one-fifth said they were unhappy.

"Nearly two-thirds of the young people surveyed said they think that the Internet, instant messaging, cell phones and other technologies make people happier, and 61% said those things make them feel closer to their family," said eMarketer senior analyst Debra Aho Williamson. "You simply cannot separate young people from technology; it is part of who they are."

Respondents generally said living without technology would be stressful. Nearly half of young people never turn off their mobile phones, even when they're trying to relax or "chill out."

Harris Interactive asked kids and teens in October 2006 what things made them happy. Having a PC made more than half of both groups happy.

Personally, I am old enough to remember life before the internet. I really don't know how we ever survived.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Technology = happiness' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 14 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Jennifer Morozowich | Comments 1 posted | Categories Technology -

Webinars – Made for the Multi-tasker in You.

Where else can you listen to an in-depth sales presentation, one that’s hopefully interesting, while you’re eating lunch, catching up on email, or writing out your grocery list?

I’ve attended five webinars so far this year and I have to say that for the most part, they’ve been a good use of time, in that I learned something new, put a company on our consideration list and in one case made a purchase.

Most customers and prospects attend webinars for a multitude of reasons, according to a 2007 study by Osterman Research – to get company product information, understand market dynamics, learn about industry trends, or learn about a vendor before making a purchase.

Like a cold call without the awkward introduction, webinars reach out to current customers and identify new prospects for a relatively low cost. If you don’t want to invest in the technology, there are lots of service providers to choose from that offer end-to-end solutions. But before you switch on the microphone, there’s a few practices you should follow to improve your odds for success and impress your customers big time.

1. Guest speakers can improve attendance – studies show that a well know industry name can increase attendance by as much as 60%. If you don’t have a keynote lined up, consider an exclusive offer or promotion as a way to generate interest.

2. Plan a rehearsal – it’s good to run through your presentation in advance and check for flow, timing and pace. Plus you should confirm the transition slides for each speaker. If you’re using a 3rd party service provider, understand any bandwidth limitations and how customers will be helped that encounter technical issues.

3. Promote in advance
– Like other ‘direct response’ vehicles, generally speaking your current customer email and dmail lists will generate higher response rates than outside ones. Your sales force is also a great tool to identify and invite key customers to the event.

4. Collect relevant customer DNA – customers expect they’ll be asked a few profile and purchase intent questions when signing. But be brief and keep the list short. Ask only questions you don’t know answers to and make sure you have a plan that uses the responses after the event. Odds are your company dB is already bloated with unusable customer information.

5. Collect compatible customer DNA – don’t wait till morning to find out the prospect list you generated isn’t compatible with your customer dB. In some cases, webinar service providers will work with you to ensure information collected is compatible with your company’s internal database formats. However if you think you’ll be hosting webinars regularly, consider developing a sign up tool built specifically to integrate on your dB.

6. Deliver an exclusive offer to attendees – free product trial, a deep discount or another means to thank people for attending. Exclusive offers will also measure response rates and program ROI. Send invitations one week in advance too - and reminders the day before. Have a customer service number clearly visible to handle any attendee questions.

7. Limit the presentation to one hour max – and keep the pace at a moderately fast clip. Because you’re not seeing any visual cues (like yawns, bum shuffling, or blackberry-ing) in your audience to assess if your message is getting through, keep the subject matter moving along and of course, provide time at the end for a Q&A.

8. Ask for feedback – a BRIEF 3 to 5 survey delivered immediately after the webinar with only one open ended question is a good way to collect top of mind feedback from attendees. You’ll have a highly useful “did well/ do better” best practices list to aid in decision making the next time round.

Used correctly, webinars can be a highly effective method to deliver company and product information, and a very measurable marketing tool when paired with an exclusive offer or promotion. And of course, a most satisfying way for multi-taskers to spend time over the noon hour.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Webinars – Made for the Multi-tasker in You.' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 17 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Robert McIntosh | Comments 0 posted | Categories B2B -

Centralizing Customer Insight

Do you have low utilization of customer feedback; lack of systematic collection of sales insight about the prospect/customer base; lack a better socialization of customer dynamics?

A significant issue with market intelligence is that it has numerous customers, and as such, tends to be both unfocused and reactionary. Enter product marketing, with a charge to spend significant time studying both market and channel requirements on how products should be introduced, how the demand creation process can be accelerated and how the “voice of the customer” can be integrated into an all-too-often inward-looking product development process. As a result, I believe organizations can garner the greatest market intelligence contribution through projects commissioned by product marketing; as such, it should emerge as market intelligence's key customer, perhaps even assuming day-to-day responsibility for it.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Centralizing Customer Insight' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 18 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Albert (Ally) Motz | Comments 0 posted | Categories B2B -

When Does Innovation Become Irritation?

On a recent flight to the United States, I came across a quintessential example of what I believe is wrong with the traditional advertising industry.

Sitting in my seat on a US Airways flight bound for Savannah, I decide to unlock the table tray in order to have a place to rest my papers on.

This is what I was greeted with:

Ad on Airplane Table Tray

That's right, the surface of the table tray was completely covered by a vinyl clingy ad for an electronic manufacturer's noise canceling headphones.

Now, I've worked with enough media planners to appreciate the strategic thinking that probably went into this in terms of demographic targeting. And from an advertiser's perspective I can totally appreciate the evil genius of the whole 'captive audience' mentality behind this media placement.

It's 2007, however, and should marketers really be trying to find 'virgin' surfaces to plaster yet another one of their ads upon? Is this really innovation? Is this something the industry should be proud of?

And check out the ad copy itself:

Detail of Ad on Airplane Table Tray

The ultimate irony, in my mind, is the ad copy's claim that the headphones "dramatically reduce unwanted sounds." It's too bad that in promoting this feature the advertiser may have dramatically increased the level of visual pollution.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'When Does Innovation Become Irritation?' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 19 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Bill Sweetman | Comments 7 posted | Categories Advertising - Ethics / Legal - Get it off your chest - Strategy -

Close call Tim Hortons.....

Last week you may have heard about a Tim Hortons location in Etobicoke which was quick to ban local students from drinking coffee inside the restaurant between 11 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays. Tim Hortons would happily sell them their coffee, but the coffee was to be consumed off the restaurant premises.

It seems the local patrons complained about the language and rowdiness of the students and just wanted to drink their coffee in peace. Many of the patrons interviewed were clearly around the retirement age and were fed up with the actions of the students day in and day out.

In a few hours the story had changed. Apparently the principal of the school met with the management at this Tim Hortons location and came to an agreement on how the issue would be managed. The ban was over as quickly as it came about.

This was clearly the actions of the management of this Time Hortons location and not that of the head office.

The students had a taste of what discrimination feels like when action was taken against them as a result of the behaviour of a few. This is a very slippery slope and an all-out ban is not the way to treat the situation.

Tim Hortons is fortunate that this situation resolved itself quickly. There are hundreds of thousands of student Customers in the city and across the Country. I can only assume that there are millions of dollars spent by these students at Tim Hortons each year. Students will remember a national coffee shop that banned people (just like them) from using their establishment. Lost future sales (in the years to come) could have a very big impact on the organization. These students will grow up one day, and will be the Customers that Tim Hortons desperately wants to attract.

The bad press is not worth it. Tim Hortons may want to buy the principal of the school a coffee two for saving them from potential lost future sales.

The right approach is to ban the few that cause the problems. Let the rest enjoy the offerings of your business. Any blanket rules you put in front of your Customers will hurt your business in the long run.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Close call Tim Hortons.....' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 20 2007 09:01 AM | Posted by Graham Kingma | Comments 6 posted | Categories Customer Experience - PR -

Social Networking Sites Not Just For Young People

The latest view from Silicon Valley has debunked a lot of myths about baby boomers not being tech-savvy. Technology investors and entrepreneurs, long obsessed with connecting to teenagers and Gen-Yers, are starting a host of new social networking sites aimed at baby boomers and older people.

Some of these sites include Eons, Rezoom, Multiply, Maya’s Mom, Boomj, and Boomertown. They look like an older version of Facebook. They also find out that older people are sticky, so they are less likely than youngsters to go from one trendy site to the next.

This prospective and relative stickiness are helping to drive a wave of new investment into boomer and older-oriented social networking sites that offer like-minded and like-aged individuals discussion and dating forums, photo-sharing, news and commentary, and chatter about diet, fitness and health care.

There are 78 million boomers – roughly three times the number of teenagers – and most of them are Internet users who learned computer skills in the workplace. The number of Internet users who are older than 55 is roughly the same as those who are aged 18 to 34, according to Nielsen/NetRatings, a market research firm.

Now that there’s a recognition that this older generation now uses the Internet just like younger people, let’s see whether the older folks will network online as well. As I told The Investment Executive last week, networking is different from dating. Boomers might want to network with like-aged individuals, but when it comes to romance and relationships, it might be a different story!

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Social Networking Sites Not Just For Young People' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 21 2007 09:55 AM | Posted by Lina Ko | Comments 1 posted | Categories Digital -

The "Millennials" - a genuine moving target [ ;--0)

Meet Paul. He could be described as the “average” young man of today. At 25, he’s just finished college, has a new job, a large circle of friends he can instantly connect to using his mobile. And he’s never had a land line. Paul is part of the generation of Canadians surrounded by digital media and technology since birth. By the age of 12, he’s been comfortable using IM, text messaging his friends and sharing music files.

And then there’s Tiffany, 24, a senior editor at a local online city site. She begins each day in her Liberty Village loft with a diet of Gmail, Hotmail, work e-mail, Globeandmail.com (I haven't picked up a print newspaper in like, forever," she says) and blogs, in that order. She says it’s a necessary regimen for maintaining a functional dialogue both at work and in her circle of friends. Tiffany, who grew up in Markham and earned a fine-arts degree from the Ontario College of Art, says mobile phone text messaging is the default mode of communication for her set, surpassing e-mail, instant messaging or even talking on the phone itself.

Introducing... the Millennials.

In a recent USA Today article, children of Boomers and older Generation X’ers are being referred to as the ‘next great generation.’ Since arriving on planet earth, they’ve been told they’re smart, to be inclusive and empathetic, and focus on goal setting and achievement. According to another ready by Claire Raines, Connecting Generations, Millennials have been bombarded with a unique set of consistently positive messages that have created idealistic, confident and hopeful youth.

"I heard it on the (digital) Grapevine."

As this group is the most tech savvy in history, they tend to use altogether different channels for gathering their news and information. "What we're seeing is a whole different relationship with marketing and advertising which obviously has ripple effects through the entire economy," said Mr. McKenzie, who heads a Millennials Strategy Group at Frank Magid & Associates. For the millennials, he said, "reliance and trust in non-traditional sources - meaning everyday people, their friends, their networks, the network they've created around them - has a much greater influence on their behaviours than traditional advertising." It’s the peer-to-group phenomenon - a digital-age manifestation of the grapevine.

Consider these thought starters and innovations as ways to reach the interactive generation:

1. Learn the abbreviated language and slang of the IM and text user.

2. Social networking spaces like Facebook and LinkedIn will continue to gain share of mind and time and become new digital ‘jump off points’ versus the traditional portal home pages of today.

3. Corporate blogging will be seen as a primary way for PR folks to plant, shape and influence conversations. Success will be measured by the frequency with which a company’s key messages become part of a content conversation string or ‘online snowball.’

4. Bloggers and their opinions will become new “brands” and will be actively targeted and courted in the hopes of your key message coverage.

5. Marketing programs benefiting those less fortunate or helping causes will be widely accepted.

6. Commercial units will be produced in a variety of sizes, formats and lengths to fit the vastly increasing number of video formats and delivery systems available.

7. Look for continued innovation on mobile phone screens that improve texting, graphics and general usability.

8. Look for more advertising messages that are activated before and after application usage, like browsing or texting.

9. On the horizon - “Active” searching, whereby a mobile user takes a ‘photo’ of a billboard of say, new Gucci eyewear (actually the phone is reading a barcode located on the ad), and then be automatically connected to Gucci’s company website.

10. Currently being tested - contextual messaging, where a user is pinged with a message from Jodie Foster herself, asking you to check out her new movie, as you walk by the Movieplex.

Millennials are a fast moving, connected, and tech savvy bunch who trade information in a flash. Being invited into their circles and keeping them interested in what you have to say will no doubt require ample battery power and seriously good conversation skills.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'The "Millennials" - a genuine moving target [ ;--0)' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 24 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Robert McIntosh | Comments 2 posted | Categories Mobile -

When Customer Service sells. And when it doesn't.

I'm going to forget that I'm a marketer for a moment and pretend that I'm only a consumer. I think it's important to do that every now and then (or whenever I'm not at work) because consumers don't think like marketers. They think like my Dad who doesn't understand what I do for a living.

My internet service provider used to be a company well known for its pitchbeavers. One day, that internet service crashed and said company could not seem to figure out why or how to get me back up to high speed. So I switched to Rogers for my home internet connection. Then, about a year later, I needed a new cell phone, so I naturally switched to Rogers Wireless. Then my wife and children needed cell phones. Rogers was the first place I thought of. Then I got telemarketed one day and was asked to switch my home phone to Rogers. So I did. Now, when Rogers goes into the dog walking business, I'll be there with my two labs and a leash.

The reason I've become one of Rogers' best customers isn't necessarily because they have better phones, or faster high speed access. It's not even that they put everything on one bill. Even beavers can do all of that.

It's simply that I have had excellent customer service experiences with them each and every time I've needed to deal with someone at Rogers. Now, I'll be the first to admit that I hate their Interactive Voice Recognition (IVR) system. (Please get rid of that thing!!!) But once I get a real person, they're always helpful, patient, kind and results-oriented.

Then I happened to walk in to a Rogers retail outlet about a month ago for a superficial issue with my Treo 650. The store's sales representative, Alex, told me I was eligible for an upgrade to the new 680. I bit. (Love a new gadget.)

Over the following week, I realized that the 680's battery didn't seem to hold a charge. By 9:30 pm, I'd be out of battery. I contacted the store and spoke to Alex. He emailed me back with an online solution which I tried right away. Didn't work. He suggested I come in to the store (not convenient since it's located at Queen's Quay and I live in North Toronto) for a new battery. So I did. He wasn't there but the other rep had the battery for me. The new battery didn't fit the new Treo. Not impressed.

Later that day, I got an email from Alex saying he would replace the whole Treo, that he was sorry for any inconvenience, and that his goal was to be sure I was happy with my purchase.

I couldn't believe that the customer service I experience whenever I call Rogers extended right down to store level.

All of this to say, why doesn't Rogers differentiate itself from everyone else by advertising something that is NOT a commodity in their very commoditized business? Customer Service. Their advertising is all about fewer dropped calls, the Fave Five, and everyone in the family wanting an internet connection. I don't get it. Any number of telco's can make the exact same claims, and are.

Rogers, you have an opportunity to differentiate yourself in your advertising. I'm doing my part as a consumer with this posting. Now it's your turn.

While I'm on the topic of customer service, I have to ask, is WestJet for real? Seriously. Their advertising shows flight attendants chasing people down in the street to return cell phones and giving the sweaters off their backs to passengers returning to a cold climate from a sunny vacation. Maybe they really can fulfill on those promises. But as a viewer of those commercials, I'm not buying or believing it.

If an advertiser has a valid point of difference (like stellar customer service), and they go so far over the top with their advertising campaign that it stretches credibility in the consumer's mind, they're wasting their money.

Got any amazing customer service stories? Share them with those of us who would be more than happy to put our faith (and hard earned money) into companies who think like marketers -- and consumers.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'When Customer Service sells. And when it doesn't.' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 25 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Bryan Tenenhouse | Comments 2 posted | Categories Advertising - Contact Centre - Customer Experience - Direct Marketing - Get it off your chest - Integration - Mobile - PR - Strategy -

Human Marketing

Web 2.0… I’ve heard this term so much that I feel slightly ill and cringe every time I hear it. When driving automatic cars suddenly became an option did we start calling it “the automobile 2.0?” No… it was still just the automobile, only more evolved.

Just like the internet. It has (and will continue to) evolve throughout the years. How many versions are we going to track the next several decades?! Will there be a Web 5.9?

The internet these days is about making connections, making the world a less scary place, and providing a platform in which to find, research, and evaluate information while engaging in meaningful dialogue with others.

As marketers, we are often guilty of creating labels and buzzwords… After all, that is our job sometimes. But, the internet now is more human, less about the companies and products, more about the people.

This “web 2.0” thing, (which I am going to refer to simply as the internet) isn’t for sale. Consumers don’t want to be marketed to in traditional ways, regardless of whether you have a blog or not. What they want is information that doesn’t feel like a hard sell. They want to have an opinion; they want the freedom to voice that opinion, and to feel as though they are making decisions based on their own research, emotions, and rationale.

So what is a marketer to do? Simple. What would you do if you saw an old man carrying a heavy bag of groceries struggling to open the door? You would hold the door open for him right?! (I hope so anyway). Apply this same rationale to your marketing efforts. Try the human approach, thinking more like a human, and less like a marketer.

Offer your customers and consumers information, tools, and resources that will help them, make them a better person, or make their life easier in some way. Try to touch their hearts, make them aware of their own humanity, and allow them to open up to you. Build a connection, a good old fashioned human connection.

Once you do this, web 2.0, 3.4 and 5.9 will miraculously be there to back you up. You won’t need to do anything. You’ll have an army of bloggers, columnists, and social-savvy tech surfers willing to spread the word for you. Brand ambassadors scattered throughout the globe with powerful opinions. Unbiased advocates who will spread the good word to others about what you do and how you do it.

Human connection. If you build it… they will come!

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Human Marketing' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 26 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Selina Jane Eckersall | Comments 0 posted | Categories Get it off your chest - Strategy -

Canadian Marketers Still Falling Short On A Strong Online Linking Strategy

Having a strong linking strategy for your Website might sound so 2001, but it’s still a vital component of your Website development and online strategy. I know it’s not sexy, but I’m finding too many Marketers letting it slide.

Don’t make the same mistake.

While Google may, indeed, be putting less relevance on inbound (and outbound) links, I'm standing strong that a good linking strategy is what's still pushing Blogs to the top of a search engine's organic results. You'll notice significant (and consistent) traffic boosts when a well-respected Blog puts you on their Blogroll, and even more action when you reciprocate the love by placing them on yours.  

Having a resource page on your Website is one of the easiest ways to make this work. One simple way to start is by doing a search that looks like this on Google:

link:www.YourWebsiteAddress.com.

What you'll get back is a list of Websites that link to your site. Some of them will be valid, some will be mediocre, and some will be plain ole' spam. The trick is to take the valid ones (and even some of the more mediocre ones) and create a unique Web page with a list that includes a reciprocated link back to these Websites and sources. If you can't make it work within your navigation, at the very least, add it to your text-driven redundant navigation at the bottom of your Web pages.

If you couple this with a strong sense of linking for your Blog strategy, my guess is you'll notice a significant rise in traffic (and maybe even PageRank). And while all of this may seem like Online Marketing 101, I'm consistently amazed at how often a core linking strategy is overlooked in places like RFPs for Website development, while Search Engine Optimization (including tactics for keyword development) seems par for the course.

Marketers are falling short on a good online linking strategy, and the reality of it all is that you can't have a strong search engine optimization plan if you don't have an even stronger linking strategy in place. We're lucky, some of the best people in understanding links and link building (I'm, of course talking about ethical - or white hat - linking techniques, and not those pushing link farms or link baiting), are based in Canada. A simple search will find you a list of capable individuals. That being said, understanding the depth of proper RFPs for Digital Marketing initiatives, I'm still unimpressed with the level of understanding that the majority of Web Development shops in Canada have when it comes to topics like link strategies or organic search engine optimization for their clients.

This is not an indictment of the industry. Things are healthy and the overall work has been amazing, but we still need to remember the basics. No matter how nice a site looks, it's going to be the engine under the hood that makes it really boogie on the Information Superhighway.

Linking is a core part of the engine.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send 'Canadian Marketers Still Falling Short On A Strong Online Linking Strategy' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 27 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Mitch Joel | Comments 2 posted | Categories Digital - Strategy -

14 Rules that will Lead to a Better Brand

I am honored to have been given the privilege of becoming a regular contributor to this group. As the welcome mat on the front door to this site says – “join the conversation”, it is my most sincere wish to engage a conversation. Marketing is about communication with our customers, so this should be the place where we can communicate with one another.

I have been thinking of what would be the most appropriate inaugural post and came up with this overview of 14 key “rules” that will lead to a better brand. I bring them to you so that we can all add to the list and to give you an understanding of how I perceive the world around me.

14 rules that will lead to a better brand. (in my opinion)

1. Organically grown brands develop deeper roots.
Brands that have a greater emphasis on organic growth have no choice but to develop a more complete understanding of how well their brand promise is delivering existing needs. It forces brands to constantly look forward toward the innovation stream that will keep the brand promise relevant and fresh with its customers. Organic growth does not preclude acquisition – merely seeks to create a better balance between the two – of fixing the holes in the bucket.

A study by Media Marketing* found that the probability of making a sale to new customers was 5-20 % compared to 60-70% of a sale to active customers – provides further support to this view.

2. Consistency is 99% of the solution.
Without consistency there is no possible foundation for a brand to keep its promise. We sometimes take for granted the ability of the human link to perform as envisioned. And because of any number of reasons – motivation, training, buy-in, challenging interactions etc… there are disconnects. To understand their challenges, their motivation and the tools they have for delivering the customer programs you develop, set a period of time each month to work alongside the customer facing staff.

3. To keep customers for life – first you need a plan, second you need a plan, third…
Keeping customers engaged with your brand for longer periods of time requires a commitment in understanding and evolving with their needs while keeping the brand fresh and relevant. As part of your long-term plan, consider creating a tenure incentive (membership has its privileges) benefit program to show your customers you are serious about wanting them to stay.

4. Needs change. Innovate or die.
See rule # 3

5. A good solution solves the problem. The right solution leaves them wanting for more.
Look beyond the immediate problem and try to understand the upstream and downstream ecosystem of the problem – at all the things that are impacted by the problem and then seek to develop extended solutions to address this. When you succeed, the customer will elevate you to partner status.

6. Listen, Focus & Astound.
Self explanatory.

7. PULL is more powerful than PUSH.
Self explanatory.

8. People are 90% of the brand.
Ask your customers where they place the greatest accountability for the brand’s performance/satisfaction both positive and negative – chances are they will point at somebody. Product failures are relatively infrequent because of the standards that go into the production process. But there is no way of engineering people. Somewhere along the way a person to person interaction will occur for which the consumer will hold the brand’s representative accountable - both positive and negative.

Having responsibility for your brand actually means taking ownership of your customers and their end-to-end experience with the brand. See rules 1-7 and 9-14.

9. Not everyone buying your product is actually your customer.
A lot of people buy our products, only some of them are actually the customers we have developed our brand promise to deliver against. When filtering down to this group – you may be surprised by how few brand customers you may actually have. Congratulations – you have just taken an important step in reclaiming your brand.

The big debate (at least in my mind) is how to manage the rest, the non-customer buyers who by some twist of fate are giving you money you never asked for – but your CFO is planning on. One approach seeks to integrate significant sub-segments into the fold – but only insofar as it doesn’t dilute the core brand platform. A more purist approach would minimize resource expenditures against non brand customers wherever possible and seek to create a self serve channel – even to the point of ‘firing’ their customers.

However the first priority is always your brand’s customers, make sure you continue to grow with them and measure your progress because they are probably someone else’s target.

10. Actions speak, feelings resonate.
A perfect solution delivered by a surly attendant will not endear the kind of repeat business that an attentive helpful attendant can with an imperfect solution. Neither situation is ideal – but as long as the solution is satisfactory – I believe most people would go with option B.

11. The weakest link defines everything.
Self-explanatory.

12. Today matters most.
See rule #11

13. Learn how to make your customers feel your thanks.
One of the most power transformational differences you can make for your brand is to let customers feel they are appreciated. Not the polite “thank you have a nice day” discourse – but the actual sincere sentiment.

So how does one manage to convey gratitude on a relatively large scale and still make it seem sincere – and not some ploy?
Providing some brand related benefit is not a wise path – because it lends itself to your customers putting a financial value and then wondering to themselves – “So after all these years and all the money I spend with Brand X, I only warrant $Y?”

To avoid this, consider a gift that is ‘priceless’ by nature such as a good works program that allows your customers to define which charity they would like to have supported. You’ll be in excellent company since American Express did a program like this in 2007. And through it all remember that you are doing this because you in fact want your customers to understand they are appreciated and your thanks are just a small part of it.

14. Brand is a Promise Kept. Brand Affinity is a relationship strengthened. Continuity is a sequence.
I have already spoken about the brand promise and brand affinity in earlier posts. The important thing to remember about continuity programs is that by themselves they are only a series of conditioned responses. That you have purchase continuity is great as it proves you have a workable value proposition for the customer. But to leverage continuity programs one needs to engage the customer and transform the behavior into a memorable experience. And therein lays the challenge we all have.

* The original research was done by Dr. Terry Varva who now is a principal with Ipsos. The original statistics where published by Doug Proden, Terry's associate, in an article entitled "How to Win Back Lost Customers" in Direct Marketing to Business Report , October 1995, on page 7.

  • Comment on this post
  • Send '14 Rules that will Lead to a Better Brand' to a Friend
  • Permalink
Sep. 28 2007 09:00 AM | Posted by Miro Slodki | Comments 0 posted | Categories Branding -

Are you passionate about a marketing topic? Would you like to write a post about it for the Canadian Marketing Blog?